Should the motto "In God We Trust" be removed from U.S. currency?
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (12780)
- The CoH Militia (2)
Some people have too much time on their hands and not nearly enough brain power. The thought of someone coming up with this is bad enough, but for someone to take it seriously and consider legislation ... that's insane! I think pappyopa laid it out very well.
The liberal cry babies out there in never, never land, should stop stomping on the Rights of American citizens!
- 18 votes
Bill P,
I have no doubt that you would be screaming for blood if they decided to replace the phrase "In God We Trust" with something like "In Allah We Trust" or even "In No God We Trust". This holdover from McCarthyism is an insult to millions of Americans whose only crime is not believing the same way you do.
Please explain how removing the phrase from our money would stomp on anyone's rights. The fact that it is there stomps on people's rights. The government has no business endorsing any kind of religious belief. Not having a religious phrase on our money doesn't infringe on anyone's rights.
The National Motto needs to be changed back to 'E Pluribus Unum' -- Latin for "From many, come one".
- 44 votes
"In God We Trust" should be stricken from the money, and we should return to the original national motto, "E Pluribus Unum."
I'm kind of partial to "This is not your God."
- 16 votes
iarnuocon,
Wow. Christian principles are more than just "you shall have no other God before me." ever even heard of the 10 commandments? they were rules that God made for His people to follow. those are moral laws that protect people.
i just can't help but love the fact that everybody has to be nice and accepting of other religions, such as american-hating religions like islam, we are accepting of the nice little mormons and jws that come knocking on our doors, but when Christianity is mentioned, dang it, that cannot be accepted!
people like you frustrate me, because you don't even understand what separation of church and state means. it meant that we were trying to remove ourselves from england's tyranny, a tyranny that forced people to attend one church. we left so we could worship Christ however we wanted.
am i, or anyone else, demanding your respect to the only true God?
hm, a fictional creator? you're probably one of those people who believe in the big bang theory and that we evolved from apes.
oh and the difference between carrying around money that says "in God we trust" and money that could be printed "allahu akbar!", "satan rules," or "there was eru, the one, who in arda is called iilúvatar," is that God is real, and even satan knows that.
it is people like you that are helping tear this country apart from the inside and let it become alright with unmoral things such as gay people, the large-scale, current holocaust of the unborn children, and the ridiculous theory (notice it is a theory, never a proven fact) called evolution.
you deny your very maker. great job there, bud, that one is really going to bite you in the ass when you're standing before Him after time on earth has ended, and He's asking you why you should enter heaven. but don't worry, you got a big man downstairs who really really wants you to deny God.
the unnatural action is to accept Christ, (which, since you are still alive) which you can still do. being under anyone's authority is challenging, but i'd rather be under God's authority than my own, since i do a really good job of screwing up my life on my own.
really, i wish that money could say, "In my God I trust"
I'll pray for you, and i don't mean that in a sarcastic way at all. i pray that you can change your mindset and that God opens your mind up to the truth!
- 21 votes
Christian principles are more than just "you shall have no other God before me." ever even heard of the 10 commandments? they were rules that God made for His people to follow. those are moral laws that protect people.
And how many of those commandments, excepting those which are universally present in all religious systems, are present in America's founding documents or early American jurisprudence? Go on, list them. That I can see, the majority of them would be held to be unconstitutional, but maybe your list differs from mine in some unforeseeable fashion.
i just can't help but love the fact that everybody has to be nice and accepting of other religions, such as american-hating religions like islam, we are accepting of the nice little mormons and jws that come knocking on our doors, but when Christianity is mentioned, dang it, that cannot be accepted!
Bull@!$%#. Everybody is nice and accepting of Christianity. I'm bludgeoned by the overwhelming presence of Christianity on a day by day basis, and no one seems to take even cursory notice of it. Knock that chip off your shoulder.
people like you frustrate me, because you don't even understand what separation of church and state means.
People like you frustrate me, because you think you understand it, and yet you're so sadly mistaken.
we left so we could worship Christ however we wanted.
If you're 250 years old, I'll eat my hat.
am i, or anyone else, demanding your respect to the only true God?
Yep.
God is real, and even satan knows that.
That's nice, prove it.
it is people like you that are helping tear this country apart
On the contrary, to find the culprit, look no further than the nearest mirror. Get your nose out of my bedroom, and mind your own business.
you got a big man downstairs who really really wants you to deny God.
Yep. I've got a nice condo by the Lake of Fire. Great view. If you listen closely, you can hear the screams of the damned.
the unnatural action is to accept Christ
Yes, clearly that's a difficult thing to do, what with so few Christians in evidence.
i pray that you can change your mindset and that God opens your mind up to the truth!
And I pray that you stop wasting your time.
Seriously, you done proselytizing now, or do I have to read more Chick tracts?
- 27 votes
the ridiculous theory (notice it is a theory, never a proven fact) called evolution
I'm so tired of this phrase. All it demonstrates is that you don't know anything about science. In science, theory is as far as it goes. It's also the "theory of relativity," but people never jump up and down shouting about how Einstein-ism is "only a theory."
There are good reasons we never call a scientific theory a "fact" but the big one is that (just like organisms) theories continue to evolve. Evolution isn't the same as it was when Darwin proposed it. Today, we have much more information about how and why it occurs. And all the evidence, the observations and data collected in the 150 or so years we've had the theory of Evolution, indicates that Evolution does occur.
- 20 votes
the ridiculous theory (notice it is a theory, never a proven fact) called evolution
Well it took a while for some one to say it, but now Pandora's box has been opened. Rather than write an incredibly long and drawn out explanation of what a theory is (because you failed Biology class) I will just list a few other theories:
Big Bang Theory
Cell theory
Atomic theory
Global Climate Change theory
Circuit theory
Film Theory
Game theory
Plate tectonic theory
Literary theory
Sociological theory
I would have just listed "gravity", but considering your education level I'm not sure if you can comprehend it.
- 15 votes
@iarnuocon
How does a religious phrase on money "damage" me? It continually reminds me that this nation is in the control of religious wingnuts who demand that I give respect to a religion I don't believe in and to a fictional "creator." It's no different, in principle, than if you were forced to carry around money imprinted with "Allahu Akbar!", "Satan Rules", or "There was Eru, the One, who in Arda is called Ilúvatar."
Well... I don't see how you feel that way. I don't recall you being forced to listen, preach, or follow any specific religion or any religion at all. If you have no religious faith, then the words "In God We Trust" are empty. I could understand your argument if you felt as though it is wasteful to print words that have no value on the money, or that the words detract from the aesthetic value of money (which is silly anyway) but that isn't your argument.
Conversely, if we were forced to carry around money that read "Satan Rules" and a majority of citizens believed Satan did in fact rule, then it wouldn't be different at all (and you'd still likely be just as angry or pseudo-oppressed). Actually, "GOD" is pretty non-descript and people assume that "GOD" is the Christian deity since they really don't' have a name for him like some other religions do, so the terminology IS pretty inclusive to anyone with any religious faith (even polytheistic religions generally have a god above all other gods).
In the end though, this is probably one of the dumbest debates about religion. What is printed on our money doesn't keep you from spending it or doing your best to acquire it. If it was pink and were imprinted with multi colored dildos and had classic pron scenes depicted on the reverse we'd still work for it and spend it irrespective of who and what we were. "God", has become very subjective... some worship a deity, others the paper that the word is printed upon
- 13 votes
Well... I don't see how you feel that way.
I think what you meant to say was that you cannot put yourself into my shoes. It's easy to see how I feel that way-- I told you so.
I don't recall you being forced to listen, preach, or follow any specific religion or any religion at all. If you have no religious faith, then the words "In God We Trust" are empty.
I'm not sure why I should have to keep repeating this. It's not like it's rocket science or anything. Allow me to repeat
The problem with the phrase is that it's a clear indication to those who are not Christian that they are, in fact, second class citizens. One need look no further than this thread to see the proof of that statement, either. How many posters, here, when confronted by the thought that there are citizens who would like to see the phrase removed, have responded by suggesting that such people are somehow "lesser" Americans, suggesting that they move to another country, et cetera? It's clear that the phrase promotes division, promotes religion, and undercuts the supposed neutrality of the government on religious issues.
Conversely, if we were forced to carry around money that read "Satan Rules" and a majority of citizens believed Satan did in fact rule, then it wouldn't be different at all
You're right, it WOULDN'T be different at all, except inasmuch as the people who currently "don't see a problem" woud suddenly very much see the problem.
Actually, "GOD" is pretty non-descript
No, "god" is non-descript. "God" is pretty much the Christian god. The terminology very much is NOT inclusive. It isn't a reference to Yaweh, Jehova, Allah, Ganesha, et cetera. Instead, ots of people (such as yourself) rationalize it based on the equivocation of "god" with "God," and then claim not to understand what the issue is.
In the end though, this is probably one of the dumbest debates about religion.
I've heard dumber, but, yes, this debate is pretty dumb.
What is printed on our money doesn't keep you from spending it or doing your best to acquire it.
Correct, it doesn't eliminate the pragmatic use of money. It merely represents a symbolic cheapening or disregard or disrespect of the beliefs of a minority of the population.
I find it interesting that so many people tell me how inconsequential the phrase is, yet fight so hard and engage in all sorts of mental gymnastics in order to rationalize retaining it. As I said, it would be far better to return to the original motto. It seems to me as though the majority of Americans could stand to learn from repeated encounters with it.
- 16 votes
"In God We Trust" should be stricken from the money, and we should return to the original national motto, "E Pluribus Unum."
I just checked the coins in my pocket (sorry -- I have no paper money on me at this time). Penny, nickel, dime, and quarter (both original and a statehood quarter) ALL say "E Pluribus Unum" as well as "In God We Trust".
There's one more word that's on all of them, and I'm glad for it too -- "LIBERTY".
- 10 votes
No, "god" is non-descript. "God" is pretty much the Christian god. The terminology very much is NOT inclusive. It isn't a reference to Yaweh, Jehova, Allah, Ganesha, et cetera. Instead, ots of people (such as yourself) rationalize it based on the equivocation of "god" with "God," and then claim not to understand what the issue is.
When a Muslim talks about God, they say either Allah or God - same with Jews. I simply revert to "GOD" being trans-faith. The key though is that it does denote some kind of faith. Hell, even if you Wiki the word GOD, you dont see any specific faith laying claim to it. It so happens that a majority of theist Americans are Christian and therefore the assumption is that GOD implies Christian as well.
Also, Ganesha is not the lord of other deities in his polytheistic realm - hes' just one of the most worshiped and popular since he is Lord of Obstacles, but a lesser deity nonetheless. You'd be thinking Devi, the Supreme Goddess and Purusha the Supreme God.
Correct, it doesn't eliminate the pragmatic use of money. It merely represents a symbolic cheapening or disregard or disrespect of the beliefs of a minority of the population.
And if this situation were reversed would you agree to adding "GOD" on the money since it would clearly represent a 'symbolic cheapening or disregard or disrespect of the beliefs of a minority of the population"
Rule by Majority doesn't mean that we can trample the minority, but it doesn't mean we have to bend over backwards and appease every single gripe and change working order or an upheaval of tradition. Sure, its only been on money for about 50 years but how effective do you think asking to remove Kwanzaa would be (having been around for only almost 50). I'm sure that if the roles were reversed you'd have a sound argument for NOT putting God on the money even though it disrespects the minority. Removing Kwanzaa disrespects cultural belief no less than forcibly removing God in this case.
The problem with the phrase is that it's a clear indication to those who are not Christian that they are, in fact, second class citizens.
Really? Do you have to sit at the back of the bus or something? Can you only enter a building through the back door? What does "God" keep you from physically or legally doing that theists can do?
when confronted by the thought that there are citizens who would like to see the phrase removed, have responded by suggesting that such people are somehow "lesser" Americans
Ah, so it is suggested by citizens... not anything legal. So it isn't 'fact' that people who are not Christian are 'second class' but merely the perception and the weakness within those who allow the suggestion to get to them. I see... So let me ask you then, how do you suppose the alternate debate that pushes reference of God out of school and ultimately the covert fight to remove God from most anything in public view makes Christians feel? Better yet, how would you suppose theists in general feel (since GOD isn't restricted to only one denomination or religion)? Yet when a Theist pipes up with "hey... hold on..." they are told their belief system is nothing more than antiquated fairy tales by men for power and that if we don't abandon our systems for the power of reason and science (which is used by men for power as well) then we're choosing to be lesser humans. In my eyes, I'd much rather take a chance at having someone feel I've offended their citizenship than their species ranking. Sorry, but that IS how I feel.
So pardon me if this whole debate really confuses me. Form both sides it is merely the pot calling the kettle black. The difference is that until recently this country has been majority Christian. It's been in politics, the schools and the work place and it has not made us a worse country for it. How then suddenly is this such a bad thing aside from "I just don't like it". Oh... religion corrupts and twists the mind... perhaps, but lets pretend we abolish religion or at least God from public view... okay... does that end warped minds and corruption? No, it removes a weak excuse and nothing more.
Personally, God / un-God has no effect on me. I don't really care, but I have taken part in this debate for the reasons I normally step into one - to see both sides and bring to light an alternate point of view.
- 9 votes
I simply revert to "GOD" being trans-faith.
Which, as I noted, it is not. Play games with Capitalization all you like, the word which appears is "God," not "god" or "GOD." Let's leave the equivocations behind. This is not an "interfaith" word, but a rationalization; and begging the question will not help you any in convincing others that it is.
You'd be thinking Devi, the Supreme Goddess and Purusha the Supreme God.
You might want to stop telling me what I think. I know what I said and why I said it. Gloss over the implications as you like. It certainly doesn't invalidate the argument.
if this situation were reversed would you agree to adding "GOD" on the money since it would clearly represent a 'symbolic cheapening or disregard or disrespect of the beliefs of a minority of the population"
As you've presented it, I can't see the sense of it. Would I agree that adding your invented term to coins would disrespect non-Christians or non-theists? Certainly the latter, and I think most probably the former, as well, since the formulation seems based primarily on the effort to rationalize use of the term in such a way as to appease non-Christians by conflating their God with everyone else's god.
Removing Kwanzaa disrespects cultural belief no less than forcibly removing God in this case.
Wow. So our government prints "Kwaanza" on our money, somewhere? I didn't know that. Or are you saying that the government in some other fashion officially endorses Kwaanza to the exclusion of other cultural/religious beliefs? Here's the scoop, Shawn-- our government is not "Rule by Majority." It's a republic, and has a Constitution. Part of that Constitution prohibits the government from endorsing one religion over others, or from endorsing religion over irreligion. Employ all the sophistry you like, you still haven't addressed the fact that this phrase is an endorsement of religion by the state.
Really? Do you have to sit at the back of the bus or something?
I'm put in mind of the necessity of justices recusing themselves when their relationship to the legal question under consideration gives the appearance of impropriety? Does the government require such recusals because some impact is proved? No. At issue is the appearance and the possibility of improper and non-neutral government preference for one side over the other. The same concept applies, here.
Really, this is such a basic consideration to this question of religious endorsement that your appearance of ignorance of the consideration makes me wonder whether you're not simply feigning lack of familiarity with it.
Seriously, "until recently this country has been majority Christian"? This country is currently majority Christian." What does that have to do with government neutrality on religion? How is the government telling Christians they have to give up their belief? Details, please, because I'm getting really @!$%#ing sick of hearing this claim made in a vacuum.
Your argument seems to boil down to "we should keep the phrase because America is mostly comprised of Christians, and who cares if the government fails in its appearance of neutrality on the question of religion?" Kid yourself if you like, buddy, but that is hardly "an alternate point of view." In the end, your exhibiting the same lack of acquaintance with the first amendment as exhibited by the more plainly spoken people in this thread who simply advocate deporting anyone who disagrees with them.
The free-exercise clause means that America's citizens can be as religious (or irreligious) as they choose, in public or in private; the establishment clause means that the government cannot be. What is exhibited throughout this thread is the fact that most Christians fail to be able to distinguish the difference between the two.
- 16 votes
Which, as I noted, it is not. Play games with Capitalization all you like, the word which appears is "God," not "god" or "GOD." Let's leave the equivocations behind. This is not an "interfaith" word, but a rationalization; and begging the question will not help you any in convincing others that it is.
Perception is context, and quite honestly, "God" means many things to many people so I didn't think it was too far fetched to bring that up.
You might want to stop telling me what I think. I know what I said and why I said it. Gloss over the implications as you like. It certainly doesn't invalidate the argument.
It certainly does if you're using a lesser deity instead of the top dog, especially when the list contains all top gods / Gods / GODS. All I was saying is that for the argument to be valid it needs to be level.
Seriously, "until recently this country has been majority Christian"? This country is currently majority Christian." What does that have to do with government neutrality on religion? How is the government telling Christians they have to give up their belief? Details, please, because I'm getting really @!$%#ing sick of hearing this claim made in a vacuum.
It has nothing to do with it, unless of course when two parties fail to find amicable resolution the court system (government) must then intervene. It is sort of their job. But then... I'm beginning to understand where the confusion has arisen. You're thinking that the government prints the money... nope.
At issue is the appearance and the possibility of improper and non-neutral government preference for one side over the other. The same concept applies, here.
I would agree except that the Federal Reserve is not a government branch.
Wow. So our government prints "Kwaanza" on our money, somewhere? I didn't know that. Or are you saying that the government in some other fashion officially endorses Kwaanza to the exclusion of other cultural/religious beliefs? Here's the scoop, Shawn-- our government is not "Rule by Majority." It's a republic, and has a Constitution. Part of that Constitution prohibits the government from endorsing one religion over others, or from endorsing religion over irreligion. Employ all the sophistry you like, you still haven't addressed the fact that this phrase is an endorsement of religion by the state.
Up to that point we were discussing the citizen call for "God" to be removed from money, not the government intervention to have it done. I'm pretty sure under that context if you re-read what I wrote you'll better understand what was stated (it wasn't all that abstract or unclear). I didn't address the 'fact' that it is endorsement of religion by the state becuase it isn't. As such, it could even be taken that the "we" portion of "In God We Trust" could mean the FED adheres to this and not the nation. The FED isn't private, but it is independent. I was under the impression you understood this and therefore the neutrality issue you're bringing up is a non-point (and sort of reverses the side comment about my alleged ignorance)
The FEDs Board of Governors are 100% government, but the bank itself is not. Look it up.
So, its like a book publisher that prints bibles. it doesn't mean that the publishing company shares the view of the authors, they're just turning a buck.
moving on...
Your argument seems to boil down to "we should keep the phrase because America is mostly comprised of Christians, and who cares if the government fails in its appearance of neutrality on the question of religion?" Kid yourself if you like, buddy, but that is hardly "an alternate point of view." In the end, your exhibiting the same lack of acquaintance with the first amendment as exhibited by the more plainly spoken people in this thread who simply advocate deporting anyone who disagrees with them
Actually, my arguemnt is mainly "since the FED, which prints the money is independent of the government, changing it by force through the government intervention does exactly what you're complaining about: Putting religious, or in this case irreligious bias and NOT neutrality in the government"
The free-exercise clause means that America's citizens can be as religious (or irreligious) as they choose, in public or in private; the establishment clause means that the government cannot be. What is exhibited throughout this thread is the fact that most Christians fail to be able to distinguish the difference between the two.
Apparently they're not the only ones. Now look, normally I don't take issue with you or your arguments, and I welcome the opportunity to go 'head to head'. Frankly, I didn't learn a lot form this little debate with you (which disappoints me - you're a pretty intelligent guy). I do however better understand your position on the matter and I've not taken anything personally (and if I've come off as brash and personal... well... it happens, but it was not the intent).
- 4 votes
Shawn-- our government is not "Rule by Majority." It's a republic, and has a Constitution.
Actually, again... no.
Were a Constitutional Federal Republic WITH Democratic Process... Rome was a Republic (just).
- 1 vote
Rome actually had a semi-democratic process. The system just wasn't one man, one vote. Citizens (in Rome) voted by tribe.
- 3 votes
Rome actually had a semi-democratic process. The system just wasn't one man, one vote. Citizens (in Rome) voted by tribe.
ok... well... I stand semi-corrected
- 1 vote
Well, the US doesn't have a one man, one vote system either, although that's the standard we putatively strive for. Both the Senate and (by extension) the Electoral College are disproportionate systems.
- 2 votes
AMEN!!!!! The few with loud mouths and big wallets think they can change what has always been....they have the right to think as they choose; but SO DO WE. 80% of Americans think of ourselves as a Christian nation and we had better, as the rage of Islam is moving fast all over Europe and here in the US too.....there is no such thing as an American Muslim for it is written in their Koran that we are the infidels and are to die.....so bone up, if you haven't in a few years folks, cause a greater 'war' is coming and you will need to decide what side you are on!!
- 5 votes
I would just like to say, first of all, when you are arguing a point calling people cry babies just makes one question your arguing abilities.
I lean toward the liberal side, but that does not mean that I am irrational. I think it is a waste of time and money to take off a quote on a piece of paper that we use as currency. Has nothing to do with my religion, morals, or political standing. All I look at on that peice of paper before I hand it over to buy something is it a $1, $5, $10, etc...
- 3 votes
I definately agree with Bill P. Some folks have indeed too much time on their hands. Get a real cause. Feed some hungry people; clothe the poor. Stop worrying about what's on the money. Nobody care how much we Christians have to tolerate in this country!! I think people can tolerate IN GOD WE TRUST. Most folks don't really pay it much attention anyway, they way we spend money here!
- 3 votes
Considering that the phrase wasn't put on money until 1957, arguements are a little limited. What did it cost to change it and why was it changed to begin with? Why wasn't it on money from the beginning if this was a "Christian" nation? What really annoys me is this: If believing in "God" is so fulfilling, and having "Faith" comforts, then why is it such an issue to have something non-material, represented on material items? Take the phrase off, just have "Faith" it's there.
- 2 votes
I think its funny how this country was built on CHRISTIAN principals but now we want to take Him out of the equation. I'm pretty sure the forfathers of this country would not be happy with this idea of removing God slowly from our country's central point, even though it has and is continuing to happen throughout the US history. Its sad really.
- 2 votes
AMEN to that!!!!!!! People need to quit worrying about things like this and start worrying about things that really have an impact on the entire country as a whole. Not just a bunch of whining little bitches !!!!!!!!!
- 2 votes
To the liberals here,
Stop letting christians get away with this crap "its only a theory"
My friends, newtons law of gravity was disproven by Einsteins "Theory" of Relitivity. Currently we are being held to the earth by "only a theory" would you like to apply the same logic you apply to gravity as you apply to evolution? Both are only theories.
Yes, our money should say E Pluribus Unum. Our National Motto, one that means we are a secular nation of many coexisting cultures, not a christian theocracy as some of you would have it.
Gods laws are a great basis for many of our laws, but we also borrow from Hammurabi's code as well, also, gods laws dont apply to how technologically advanced we have become in many to most instances. Remember, it may claim to be gods book, but it was written by man.
- 3 votes
I look at it this way. What is wrong with giving a little hope to people that there is somthing better for us out there, even if you are not a full blown bible thumper. I look at most teach us to treat each other with respect and kindness. Wow what a dramatic change that would make in our world. And I have a questions these BoneHeads that think they are doing something great!!!!!!!! Are they still going to be married, in the name of God??????
- 1 vote
Someone tell me....how do join the Athiest Church? I only ask because it is a religion unto it's self. They worship apparently in the Congressional Halls that set the rules and laws of our land or in our court systems undermining all that has ever been good.
Athiesm is a belief that God does not exist..so be it they are free to. They should not however TELL me what to believe, where I can pray, or when I can pray.
I remember growing up saying the Pledge of alligence to the Flag every morning in school. I remember saying a prayer at the begining of every sporting event; not for the home team to win but that all the atheletes would be safe from injury. No one was ever asked to come forward and be saved...this was left for the Preacher on Sunday.
You wonder why the world is going crazy it is because we are greedy self centered creatures that have turned our backs on God so he is letting us fail....We took prayer out of school a Generation & a half ago...now we are trying to take his name off of anything that is remotely connected to a Government building and even our printing press. Do you honestly think that our Forefathers didn't seek some kind of guidence spirtually when trying to write the Constitution? Our Soldiers fighting in foreign lands PRAY EVERY DAMN DAY...OH by the way we are also Gov. ISSUE...Please don't tell me what to do. We fight to preserve the freedoms of all Americans and to liberate those under Socialism and Dictator style Gov. yet I fear we are on that same path sometimes. If something offends you don't listen to it,,,if what I say offends you ( sorry freedom of speech and I have an OPINION just like you ) if you can voice yours on any subject then I should be able to voice mine as to why I disagree with you.
- 6 votes
I am soooo sick and tired of all this mumbo jumbo bulls*&t........This is Our country , OUR money , Our rules .... this is America or have you forgotten ,,, why should we change our lives , beliefs , customs to satisfy immigrants ... frankly our country is going to hell because of all the immigrants ,,, i pitty my grandchildren and theirs ....its a shame how pompus azz ppl keep wanting to allow them to try and change us...
And to the idiot that wrote this
The National Motto needs to be changed back to 'E Pluribus Unum' -- Latin for "From many, come one". THIS ISNT ITALY OR ANY OTHER FRIGGEN COUNTRY so take your language and your beliefs to YOUR COUNTRY and stop whinning in ours !!!!!!!!
- 3 votes
What is there about atheist that makes them want to impose their will on the rest of us? A majority of the people in this country do believe in God, whether they call him Allah or whatever, so it is appropriate for "In God we trust", to appear on our money, etc., not only for historical reasons but also because a majority of us do. Also, when are atheist going to realize that you can't believe in the "Big Bang" theory of cosmology plus an expanding universe (which we now know is expanding at an accelerating rate) and not have a force external to the universe responsible for these conditions? That force is God, no matter what your concept of Him is.
- 3 votes
The title God is just that a title, unless you give it any importance or significance it really holds no value...so to those who do not have any religious affiliation you have nothing to worry about because as far as you are conerned there is no such thing...which is your opinion and belief to which you are entitled to living here in the United States. Our founding Fathers' were wise in their decision to use such a word because to have personalized the name would have given one religon significance over another by doing it this way allows everyone and anyone the freedom to practice what their belief is right here in the United States nowhere else is this freedom given...this great country of ours was started so we can have different beliefs, opinions,and political views without being imprisoned or killed we are many and are from many different places but that is what makes up our Great Country...to be so diverse but yet to be able to unite when we need to....I'm proud to be an AMERICAN!!!
Dear Person,
I recently saw a bumper sticker that says it all... "If you are an athiest and believe there is no God.........You had better be right!!!
Art D
- 2 votes
I am so happy people are against this, I am sorry but one reason for our countries fight for freedom was based on religion. There are more Christians than Atheist and I believe that the majority should rule, I am tired of the few over powering the many.
Thanks
- 1 vote
This is not about christians and athiests it is about humans. We need to quit seperating ourselves. We are one species. Why should we hate or discredit each other over religion? Wars have been faught and countless numbers of people have died in the name of religion. This country was built on immigrants who for many reasons have come here. One of which is to escape religious persecution. Athiests are not the only non-christians here and it is foolish to assume that. Stop persecuting and demeaning those who do not share christian perspectives. I think Hitler taught us that lesson not so long ago.
- 1 vote
I agree with you Bill. The issue goes back to the founding fathers. Yes, this country was founded on religious freedom, but those founders were Christians believing in ONE loving God. So, there is historical value for sure. Does it stomp on our rights? On the surface, no, but look at everything that has been going on for the last 20 or so years. Prayer taken out of schools, even when student lead. 10 commandments removed from state buildings, Bibles removed from inauguration and other swearing in ceremonies, now we're looking at the hate crimes bills which essentially undermines every right of Americans. Certainly it is aimed at Christians...no saying that homosexuality is WRONG, no public airings of Christians sermons that voice that belief. That legislation is not only a violation of MY rights as an AMERICAN citizen, to freedom of speech, but also to my freedom of RELIGION! It's a compilation, done slowly and quietly by the few with means and connections. If you look at the vote, you'll see that 87% of people were in favor of keeping the motto, "In God We Trust". We are bombarded by a LIBERAL media that shows ONE side of the story and is slanted NEGATIVELY towards the Conservatives and the Christians. Media bias is destroying our country. It is scary times we live in. You think that it is no big deal because your beliefs are different MarkP73. It is fine to believe differently. You have that choice, fought for you by Americans who gave their lives for YOU. Even the God I serve and believe in gives YOU that right that choice. However, the leadership of this country is taking us down a road to socialism and communism. Take a look at the countries that live under these kinds of governments. When you take rights from one group, religion usually first, then you will see a slow movement of your other rights. Once a violation of our constitution in the form of religious freedom and speech within that religion are accepted as ok, other rights will be taken away one by one until you no longer have rights. I pray that God will open your eyes to see HIS love, HIS grace and HIS mercy! He loves you so much! Maybe it's what we Christians need though. We need our eyes opened with opposition so we can grow in our faiths. Despite our beliefs, I think that this one small step will end in a huge leap for our rights in a bad way.
- 1 vote
Wow,
I have read for about 45 minutes and find it funny that the people against having "In God We Trust" find it offensive. Let me ask a simple question that I doubt I will ever see the answer to because one day all will know the truth. I thought that this was a majority rules nation but there is an idiot on here that does not think so. So from now on since you are a liberal by choice don't vote because it doesn't matter because majority doesn't rule. What an idiot to think that if the majority says something that it is not going to happen or come into law. The justices vote on something and the majority of them vote yes and the law is set in stone, how is that not majority rule. The people vote for a President and he wins over 50% of the majority votes and then the electorial votes which are suppose to follow the majority say that he is President I guess then Majority didn't rul in that. Give me a break. Also look at the pole the last time I checked 87% say leave it alone and 13% say take it off. So we should listen to the 13%. So since the minority rules then let's start voting again so that I can join the other side so that I can actually vote for something I do not believe in so what I do believe in is accepted.
I tell you what come to Yukon, OK and try and take away the rights that I have that I have fought for (20 years), oh and while you are here go ahead and desicrate my flag in front of me too. This is the greatest country that has ever been, but with all the liberals it is slowely deteriorating and soon will not be the America that our Founding Fathers knew. Actually nothing in the Constitution says "Seperation of Church and State" That is something that the people after our Founding Fathers have read into it. Someone stated it correctly it was not seperation fo Church and State it was so that the government could not tell you how and who you would worship. Putting "In God We Trust" does not say anything about a religion, what it says is that we trust in a being that is above us. AA also makes you put your faith in a higher being, are you going to start going after that organization so that all the alcoholics will turn back to drinking again because heaven forbid we ask them to believe in something above ourselves.
Oh by the way who discovered that the world was round and not flat? I can tell you it was written in the Bible long before anyone actually discovered it. "He sits above the circle of the earth", wow imagine that. Oh yeah but now you are going to say the Bible was written by man and so is not correct and true. But, you don't have a problem with other manuscripts that are older than the Bible and we do not have originals of them, where we have originals of the Bible. Actually, I will not change your minds. But when and if you find that alot of people just vanish and it seems that all of them were the believers that you so love to hate, I hope then you will think about this and pick up the #1 best seller and think hard.
God Bless,
David Morris
- 3 votes
In principle, our country was founded by Christian's who were trying to escape persecution. Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian values and in no way was it intended to be an atheist country. Those with small minds cannot believe in anything that makes them wrong, or in better terms, not a God. Darwin died a Christian, and said, after looking at the human eye, that it would be a mistake of great magnitude to believe that there was not a creator. While I understand people issue with it, these are the same people, in large part, that think it is OK to give my daughter an abortion without my consultation, teach gay marriage as normal family values, and literally pee on everything that I and the MAJORITY of our Country believes in. So I do not feel the least bit of sadness for their plight. Who is pushing values and beliefs on who? That is the greater question here, isn't it ?
No where in the Constitution does it say there is a separation of Church and State.
It states that the government will not form a national religion as England did. And that we have the right to worship in any religion.
People mistake letters that Jefferson wrote to someone else about religion and the state. Even then, he was all for Christianity and other's right to worship the way the wanted.
There is NO separation of church and state.
The majority of the people of the United States believe in God. So you minority..too bad. As you can see by this poll....87% want the words "In God We Trust"..to stay on the coins and bills. Get over it! The minority should never rule!
- 1 vote
Of course it violates our rights, isn't it enough that the atheist movement has taken prayer out of our school, brought upon the fallacy of separation of church and state since the early 1920s with that infamous supreme court ruling, to the point that the likes of me, born 4 decades later, was led to erroneously believe this nonsense and go in closet, and keep religion confined to the walls of church, NOW THEY WANT TO TAKE "IN GOD WE TRUST" out of our currency's printing? Let me tell you these hacks like the ACLU and militant atheists have distorted the image this great nation has overseas.......to the point where the Eastern Europeans think our nation wasn't found on religion, what nonsense the left hasn't done to this greatest nation?
I would hope EVERYONE agrees that this is a country founded on the people have the right to be heard. And the majority rules!
American Freedom is the right to have your beliefs, freedom of choice, but those beliefs are not to interfer with other's belief or the safety, and well-being of the population as a whole.
So let's put "In God We Trust" issue on a national ballot. Let the majority vote decide.
By the way, how come we don't hear from NRA across the nation about this? Where are the prime-time TV ads? Where do they stand? Remember the right to bear arms, and freedom of religion. They speak loudly with giving lot's of money to politicians to keep the right to bear arms, but how about freedom of religion.
Come on NRA, show that you have the gutts to stand-up and be counted, prove to the public that you've spend as much time and money defending "In God We Trust".
How does that phrase affect the safety and well-being of the population as a whole? Throughout my years (62) I have never had anyone force me to believe in any type of religous preferences, or to say "I believe in God". It is my choice! I can say that! But give me a break, no one in government, and the majority of Americans are not forcing the minority voice on this issue to choose one God over another. America gives me that right. Now a few want to interfer with my rights.
Come on, quit debating, let the majority rule, it's the law of the land, or is someone afraid of the voting process.
- 1 vote
For all of you who don't like the words "in God We Trust" or the English Language for that matter, then move to one of those other countries where people don't believe in God and don't speak English and you should be happy. Or if you want to stay, stop trying to change what our forefathers fought and died for and what this Country was founded on.
I think the original idea behind "separation of church and state" was to insure that the "state" could not take over and dominate or dictate to the "church". It was never intended to keep the "church" out of the "state".
The communists are consolidating their rise to power by establishing atheism as the state religion. It is THEY and not the rest of us who are violating the separation of church and state. They have made their hatred for good and emnity towards freedom the building blocks of their state sponsored religion of atheism.
Under the current Stalinist regime it is a crime to think freely (the state is supposed to do that for you), it is a crime to dissent or have an opinion (freedom doctrine), it is a crime to work hard (higher taxes for those who actually are successful). The state has nationalized the car industry and the banking industry and is aiming to nationalize health care. Somewhere Karl Marx is smiling. Hugo Cesar Obama and Vladimir Ilyich Pelosi are carrying the worker paradise to new heights.
What is it that Mike and the Mechanics once sang "Pledge Allegiance to the Flag, Whatever Flag they offer" Any American who does not stand and fight against this rising dictator tyranny deserves the enslavement that is coming.
- 3 votes
This country is predicated on the majority rule. According to the poll, only 12% favor the removal of "In God we trust" from our coinage. The majority is against removal. Let the majority rule, and who really gives a rat's ass what atheists think, anyway?
- 4 votes
It seems that some that may, or may not have yet, benefitted from this country's freedom get quite feisty when it comes to truly realizing what all of our national and state, consitutions were founded on-that being that they (the founders) truly believed that there was (is) a creator and that being thankful for His grace will allow for His blessings to be bestowed upon the new nation that was founded. I ask for you that do not believe this to A.) read any, and all National and State constitutions for vailidity and B.) to truly examine your heart to determine if your anger over this issue is good for you or anyone else. Personally, I have my beliefs as I do not believe that we "out of nothing, came something" without a higher intelligent being designing us. I (and i would think you too) should be very pleased that YOU WERE DESIGNED, not just an accident or a "chance of nature". But that is my belief. And if you look at the original wording, intent and context of these Constitutions (whether federal or state) the right to choose a religion, or not to, is a most basic right. At the same time, the separation of church and state issue was never intended to say that one cannot or should not be allowed to express their faith but to prevent the establishment of a state sponsored religious ethos. God is a universal being-if you want to believe in Allah, Buddha the Hindu Gods or whatever, that is your right in this country to do so-nobody is TELLING you to believe or not to believe but all faiths believe in a God. The saying does not endorse any particular God which the founders were wise to avoid as they wanted to prevent the establishment of a state religion. You can believe if you want-or not. If you think that we all become worm food-have at it and you better hope you're right as the alternative may not be good for you if you're wrong. But this is your choice and this is exactly what He wanted-choose Him or not. He gave us free will while we are here.
For those of you that are angry about your freedom of religion-I ask you why are you angry-you can believe or not believe. Makatak 01 is right. This country is (or was by some accounts) about majority rules. And it should be. Many millions have fought and died for your rights that we many times take for granted in this country. So please be thankful for your freedom and please stop being angry. As a recent newborn Christian-my anger is gone. I used to be totally angry about this stuff. I am not anymore-just saddened at the lack of respect that sooooo many show each other-and on both sides. For those of you that may be constantly angry---please ask yourselves---who are you helping by your anger??? Be thankful for your freedoms and the wisdom of the foundng fathers because without that, I suggest that none of us would be able to write any of this. My God wants you to have your freedom---and this is primarily manifested in the freedom to choose Him or not---and the rest just falls right into place. True Christians (not a particular man-made organized religion) practice patience, kindness and Love no matter what. Try it----and see whether you gain peace in your life. I believe that you will and then you can gain the richest gift there is-WISDOM. And with wisdom comes humility and then (again) the rest falls into place. So I hope that all of you find inner peace that comes with knowing that we didn't just happen-but were planned in His image. And this is not a bad thing at all. And just one more thing----what do you do when you hit rock bottom in life???? I believe that if you're honest---that's when you truly ask this question to yourself cuz that's when you're not only in great need of His love but your heart is most open and then He comes to you...........
Hoping that all of you recognize this for this is the basis of our freedom.
- 2 votes
Our country was founded on God. We are the land of the free, so if you come here, you do not have to follow any religion. However, this is what our country was built on. If we went to any country that followed Buddah, would we be in an uproar b/c it offended us, or would we just understand that, that, is the major religion in that country and respect their right to hold it sacred and dear. I think to insist that Japan or any other country, cover up their herritage for newcomers coming in, is an infringement on rights. If we are truly to respect people's rights to believe however they want, then that means we should be allowed to display it however we want, and if the others want to display their God, well, if we are to honor everyone's rights to believe how they want, well then so-be-it. Unfortunately, at this point, this movement to yank God out of everything in order to not offend everyone, is only making it so that our youth and media believes it is NOT okay to bring God up at all. Which if this is the land of free speach, it is almost reverse discrimination. For instance, for the most part, most of our religions believe that gayism is wrong. In telivision shows, movies and even our school systems, it is being pushed that if you believe that it is wrong, you are in a sense prejudiced and ignorant. So we are ignorant for following our religion. I have even heard of school systems speaking against religion and pushing evolution. So, we are allowed to talk about everything EXCEPT religion. Doesn't that trample on OUR right to believe as we want.
Further more, not all, but almost every religion out there broke off of the Jewish religion. Sooooo, doesn't that mean it is largely the same god. Budah never claimed to be a god. He was a philosopher. So believe in his teachings. There are other philosophers too. Can't one believe in their teachings and believe in a God at the same time. So how would one belief really be offensive to another?
We should be allowed to proudly display our country's herritage, the same as China, Japan, or any other country would not change their herritage or take down their proud displays just b/c other people were filtering in.
And just for arguments sake, lets assume that the only religion that ever claimed to have a spiritual God head was real. True. There really is a God that started the Jewish religion and then broke off to start so many other religions that basically all have the same God. Lets say that He really wants us to trust in Him. And b/c we don't want to step on the toes of newcomers, we turn our back on God as a country completely. It's already happening in the fact that Oprah was even allowed to tell a Christain on national television, "Oh shut up about the bible. We don't want to hear about the bible." So, believers are being shut up, where nonbelievers are actually almost being revered for speaking against God. It is becoming 'cool' and the 'in' thing to push other beliefs so much that it is almost considered WRONG to speak about God at all. Well, if this GOD that almost ALL religions believe in, with only the details of how to believe in Him being different, is real, and we take this attitude. Not only are we putting the souls of so many in danger, but we are taking the chance of leaving our country without God's protection. Is it possible that this country has done so well, and come so far b/c it was built on GOD. Do we really want to turn our backs and throw that away? Perhaps we can come up with a compromise meaning, anyone, anywhere, as long as it isn't a religious belief that causes physical harm to anyone, can be allowed to display their God however they want. Meaning, this country's herritage can continue to be displayed as well. Maybe even allow prayer time back in schools, with the condition that it isn't led by a specific religion. Everyone can bow their heads and pray how they want.
Just an additional note. I do believe that gayism is a sin. However, according to my religion a sin, is a sin, is a sin. I also believe that to yell at my children is a sin. Or to be selfish. We all sin. And no sin that I commit is worse than gayism. My only beef with the move to accept gayism, is not that they are worse than me, or deserve to be treated worse, or even deserve to be persecuted, but I have to ask for for forgiveness for me sins. My only concern is that these homosexual people that God loves just as much as He loves everyone, and not because they are homosexual, but in spite of the fact that they are homosexual, just as He loves me in spite of the fact that I have a difficult time not being selfish. My concern is that because Americans are pushing that it is all right, then there is no need for them to ask for forgiveness. This is souls that God loves that may be lost. I know there is scientific proof that they were born this way. If you truly believe, weren't we all born to sin? And don't we all? It is not a matter of who is better than who. God does not want us to judge, or hurt any of His children. He wants us to love one another. He only knows our hearts and what we are truly doing wrong. If I had a real friend and he/she pointed out that I had an issue with a particular sin, I would not want them to judge me, or hurt me, or leave me, but understand that none of us are perfect. Bring it up to me as a good friend, but don't treat me like I'm worse than you, or drop me over it. You have sins too. What I am saying is, where I would not want my friend to treat me wrong, I would not want them to lie to me and say what I am doing wrong is not a sin either.
Art Dimiano (hope I spelled your name right. Sorry if I didn't but), GOOD POINT!!!! Wow. :)
I agree entirely that this is an absolutely ridiculous discussion and conversation. I am an atheist and generally liberally minded, but come on people, it doesn't HURT anyone to have some words somewhere. There is no FORCING of religion on us by these words existing. If parents are worried about their children being exposed to religion and attaching onto it, then you really need to found a new country because all the existing ones have a slew of religion that may "taint" your child. The truth is that your child will make a decision for themselves, because they will eventually be exposed to the world, where religion exists. My wife and I hope our kids grow up to be atheists, as well, but we hope that they use their own intelligence to come to the same conclusion that we have.
As for the comments about this being a country ruled by the majority...there are plenty of laws in place to protect the minority. The hate crime laws being extended to include gay people is not about saying that Christians are wrong and homosexuality is perfectly okay, it's about protecting a minority group from the majority of people. I know many of you are going to argue this or that about homosexuality being wrong or insane or whatever, but just save your breath, there's no real logical argument against it, it's just what you have chosen to believe. And you have every right to do so; you can choose to not be a homosexual and the others can choose to be. They may end up in hell, but how is that your problem? And how is allowing them to be beaten going to fix that problem? Also, if you want to extend this argument to being about exposing your children to homosexuality, see the above discussion about religion. Homosexuality has always existed and will always continue to exist, so everyone will be exposed to it one way or the other.
Let us suggest the ACLU and the atheist take a trip to somewhere outside the USA. If they are so bent on taking away from us, our history, our beliefs, then they should find another place to live. I am sure there are many of us that would be glad to help them find a place..I suggest Nigeria or Darfur.
Let us suggest the ACLU and the atheist take a trip to somewhere outside the USA.
The concept of gathering those who disagree with you, and shipping them to parts unknown, is not a new concept. Hitler used cattle-cars.
Regards
- 3 votes
I agree there is no reason why these crybaby's should be allowed to have their god on teh notes when hard working Americans can't have Allah, Vishnu or Thor. How about Allah Akbar for a year and then perhaps rotate around to Budda?
- 2 votes
I think having anything 'God' on $$$$ is against everything Jesus ever taught. I think it qualifies for "@$$kicking the moneychangers in the temple"
Dear Vineys,
I think that it is curious that those who spout the "Rights" accorded to US do not know who our founding fathers say these "Rithts" come from! The Declaration of Independence states we receive them from our Creator; NOT THE STATE. Read on...
If you have never read the Declaration of Independence..
The Declaration of Independence
Action of Second Continental Congress,
July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
WHEN in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.
"WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and...."
http://www.constitutionfacts.com/index.cfm?section=declaration&page=readTheDeclaration.cfm
Your rhetoric is absurd, no God, no Rights. End of discussion.
- 1 vote
Have these people nothing better to do with their time on the hill than to waste money on issues that have NOTHING to do with running a govt. this was decided by our forefathers so I suppose we now say they were idiots and had NO right to infringe on you poor illiterate liberals get off the bandwagon get issues out there that will SERVE PROTECT and Make our world a better place when we leave than it was while we were here changing the money wont change the heart or mind of the MAJORITY
Your rhetoric is absurd, no God, no Rights. End of discussion.
You have the arrogance to make such a statement, even after contradicting yourself in such a clear and obvious manner?? Read your own post:
The Declaration of Independence states we receive them from our Creator; NOT THE STATE.
Then...
That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed,
First, look up "endowed." Then go read your own post again, where it says that rights ARE instituted by government.
Regards
- 2 votes
I'm 81 yrs old and a 4th generation American. We have the best government (until the new bucnh moved into the White House) in the world. If we take God out of our lives we'd be nothing. Obama blames everything on the Bush bunch but after he took ofc. the country has been falling apart. He has the scarest ideas on how to change our country that I've ever heard. Are we sure he's not a muslim and Commie? Sure sounds like one and is bent on destroying out land.
Janie
- 1 vote
excuse me, but where in the constitution does it say anything about printing religious message on currency being a right? Does it effect your faith in God an iota whether "In God we Trust" is on our coinage. It is an unfair endorsement of the Judeo-Christian god. How would you feel if the coin said "In Allah we trust" or "In Horus we trust"?
- 1 vote
I'm 81 yrs old and a 4th generation American.
Good for you! :)
If we take God out of our lives we'd be nothing.
If "In God We Trust" is the only thing in your life that represents God, you're not practicing a religion, you're practicing politics
Obama blames everything on the Bush bunch...
He's not the only one.
...but after he took ofc. the country has been falling apart. He has the scarest ideas on how to change our country that I've ever heard. Are we sure he's not a muslim and Commie? Sure sounds like one and is bent on destroying out land.
I'm so sorry you seem to have fallen for a bunch of racist, bigotted propaganda, but the fact is, this country is on an upward course for the first time in eight years. And Pres. Obama has been in office for less than a year.
Regards
- 3 votes
In case you didn't realize it... the people wanting to get religion out of our government are also Americans. You have the right to worship the faith you follow as you please but you do NOT have the right push your faith down everyones throat. Why is it that the people who are screaming about religious freedom the loudest are the ones who want to deny others the same right?
- 2 votes
It's the Orwellian logic; all relgions are equal, but theirs is more equal than others.
Regards
- 3 votes
The phrase “In God We Trust” doesn't necessarily have to imply the God of the Bible, nor any other deity, for that matter. A god is an “object” of worship, and everyone worships something, including atheists! Some worship money; some worship their automobiles; some worship themselves; etc. So, those of you out there, who can't help but stare at the phase "In God We Trust" every time you hold a dollar bill, don't get so offended by it. Simply think of the word god as whatever it is that you already worship. There, everyone is happy now J
can we put obama's picture on the food stamp? that's all the money that will be left, and they will be as worthless as our currency.
The phrase “In God We Trust” doesn't necessarily have to imply the God of the Bible, nor any other deity, for that matter.
There are nonChristian religions that go well-beyond having a different name for Deity, the entire concept of putting "trust in God" may be incompatible with the doctrines of such religions
A god is an “object” of worship, and everyone worships something, including atheists! Some worship money; some worship their automobiles; some worship themselves;
That has got to be one of the most ridiculous attempts at playing with semantics I've ever seen.
So, those of you out there, who can't help but stare at the phase "In God We Trust" every time you hold a dollar bill, don't get so offended by it. Simply think of the word god as whatever it is that you already worship.
Such an act would be violation of my religion. And who qualified you to tell me how to practice my religion?
Regards
- 2 votes
Thanks, Dave in Iowa! Simply and well put! We as Americans have a short history when compared to some other countries. But it is rich!One of the reasons our forefathers came here was to persue religious freedon. History declares it in Many ways! What never ceases to amaze me is the sarcasm and anger that seems to go along with atheism. Ben Stein wrote a super article on this subject this last week. In it he comments on the fact that he is Jewish, and it is a comfort to Him to see these words,"In God we trust". At the end of the day, for those of us who know this God, it is a comfort to know that whether His name appears on a dollar, a building, or anywhere else, He is still there! He always will be! "I am the Alpha, the Omega, the beginning and the end," that is a quote from the Guy whose name they want to eradicate.
One of the reasons our forefathers came here was to persue religious freedon.
If you're talking about the pilgrims of the settlers at jamestown, no, they came to practice THEIR religion to the exclusion of all others. They had no intention of establishing religious freedom whatsoever.
If you're talking about Washington, Franklin, Madison, Jefferson, etc., then not really, since most all of them were BORN in this country.
Ben Stein wrote a super article on this subject this last week. In it he comments on the fact that he is Jewish, and it is a comfort to Him to see these words,"In God we trust".
Only half that letter is authentic, half of it is a forgery.
At the end of the day, for those of us who know this God, it is a comfort to know that whether His name appears on a dollar, a building, or anywhere else, He is still there!
If you had a real faith, you wouldn't need the government support and sanction of your religion.
Regards
- 2 votes
Quote from iarnuocon: "I'm bludgeoned by the overwhelming presence of Christianity on a day by day basis, and no one seems to take even cursory notice of it."
Oh you poor oppressed dear. I can only hope that you are being bludgeoned symbolically, and that the "damage" you suffer from seeing "In God We Trust" on our money is not permanent, for God is Love. You disagree with the masses. If you hate America so much, then get the F&%$ out so you don't have to abide the insult to your enlightened and informed self. Here in America, you are free to spew your opinion without fear of reprisals. See if you can find another country that will put up with your @!$%#. Not likely.
The liberal cry babies out there in never, never land, should stop stomping on the Rights of American citizens!
Take out "liberal" and insert "Republican and Conservative."
Hi Bill P: I totally agree with you, and the American people need to stand up to them. However, the only way to stop these people is to vote them out of office, and unless the American voters have gotten the message and DO vote every member of each house OUT in November, I don't see anything else we can do.
If the people who want religious graffitti on our money would take the time to do a tiny bit of research and use their brain...they would find what I found. The "Continental Dollar" and other currency printed by the United States of America has no references to religion.
Why? Because George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Ben Franklin and many others made it clear in the Constitution and Bill of Rights that it is a bad idea to mix church business and government business.
Thomas Jefferson coined the phrase, "separation of church and state." Most American Presidents until the McCarthy era mentioned this gold standard and abided by the spirit of the founding fathers. By insisting that we have Pharisees for Presidents (when you pray, enter into a closet...not in public to be seen by men."), faith-based initiatives (The Spanish Inquisition was a faith-based initiative), religious graffitti on our currency - you are violating the clear intent of the Constitution.
IQs seem to have dropped sharply during the last 50 years or so. I don't suppose the great American experiment will survive. We have strayed so far from the vision and wisdom of those intelligent, enlightened men who tried so hard to establish a secular government.
- 19 votes
OK, let's up this is simple terms that an apparently uneducated person like you can understand. YOU ARE WRONG! This quotes you are using are taken completely out of context and used by the liberal left media to brain wash Americans who are too lazy or stupid to find the facts themselves to further there anti-Christian cause. I could list you PAGES of links that would refute the very idea that our leaders were not Christians and wanted to keep church out of the government. Actually the opposite is true! Many of our leaders expressly stated that leaders would only be good ones if they followed Christian principle and turned to God for guidance and inspiration. I really wish I could retrieve a post made several months ago because it had the "exact" quotes, copies of their writings and listed things like the date of baptism of George Washington. And you don't get baptized unless you believe in Jesus Christ, not just a deity as some folks claim. This can be proven over and over, yet the media continues to perpetuate a myth of separation of church and state. The separation was to keep government out of the church, such as in England where the King was head of the Church of England. You can argue about this all you want, but I KNOW the facts, I have researched this because of misinformed people and I wanted to have my facts straight. But like another post stated, what's the big deal anyway. We are NOT forcing you to serve God! You can put your faith in a dog for that matter, I cannot force my beliefs on you, but the anti-Christian paranoia is getting ridiculous. The only religion really discriminated against now days is the Christians because it is politically correct. Oh, I forgot, we don't deserve special treatment like the Muslims because it was Christians who founded this country but are now obsolete. Let me just remind you of one very important FACT, it was Christian's who fought for your right to speak such drivel and have the Freedom not to believe in God.
- 11 votes
"Because George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Ben Franklin and many others made it clear in the Constitution and Bill of Rights that it is a bad idea to mix church business and government business. "
WRONG. They all believed and did include their believe in God and all aspects of government business.
OklahomaMom...where do I start???
Aside from the obvious fact that you can't speak English in a coherent manner, you are making some huge assumptions about what you learned in school. How about George Washington chopped down a cherry tree and then took the heat for it. Not true, but it's in those books you would like to cite.
How about George Washington prayed with his troops at Valley Forge. Another myth from people with your willingness to spin history out of all recognition, but who can actually write a sentence in English.
Oh, by the by, I am one of those who fought for my freedom to say what I believe. I served in combat in Vietnam with the 9th Infantry Division and was wounded in combat on 8/18/1968. I always have a hard time with that anniversary date because my entire platoon was wiped out in less than an hour. That's all I have to say about that.
Another point is that the best soldier in third platoon was SSgt Stafford Cowles. He was an avowed atheist who fought for your right to disengage your brain while spreading lies, propaganda and myths about our founding fathers.
Don't cite "lots of books" that would have to be re-written. The books you are talking about were not written to enlighten. Their sole purpose was to re-write history. If you have any interest in the truth, read the words of those brilliant men who founded this country. They can, and did, speak for themselves.
Have a nice day.
- 11 votes
My name is David which none you are willing to give a real name to what you are writing.
Plain and simple- Our founding fathers who write the great piece of work called the constitution, clearly is singed with THE DAY OF OUR LORD. Is that not a proclamation! How about our Star Spangled Banner, quote "Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us a nation! Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto: "In God is our trust!"".
Believe what you want. They wrote and signed it, then they lived it. This was a nation found by Christians. YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT, BUT NOT CHANGE OUR HISTORY!!!
- 11 votes
OklahomaMom, you can bulls--- all you want about having a veritable tidal wave of evidence just beyond your reach, but until you actually produce an iota of this hidden bounty, you're simply performing the rhetorical equivalent of a grand mal seizure.
The only religion really discriminated against now days is the Christians because it is politically correct.
Right, the only religion dcisriminated against in the US is the religion practiced by the vast majority of its citizens, and very nearly all of its gov't officials. Poor oppressed Christians, indeed.
How about our Star Spangled Banner, quote "Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us a nation! Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto: "In God is our trust!""
Apparently, this guy learned the lyrics of the US anthem from a bad Chinese bootleg.
YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT, BUT NOT CHANGE OUR HISTORY!!!
And you have the freedom, though apparently not the ability, to learn US history in the first place.
- 12 votes
David, there's a big difference between being a nation comprised predominately of Christians, and being a "Christian nation." We are and always have been the former. We are not, and never have been the latter. It's unfortunate that his bothers you, but revisionist history notwithstanding, that's simply the way things are.
- 17 votes
David, the star spangled banner was written during the war of 1812, and Francis Scott Key was not a signatory to our Constitution.
I'd suggest you study history a bit more, and include some sources that aren't from the Christian playbook. I hate to see people surrender their minds because they're afraid of dying.
- 10 votes
In 1814, Francis Scott Key wrote new words for a well-known drinking song, "To Anacreon in Heaven," to celebrate America's recent victory over the British. However, only in 1931, following a twenty-year effort during which more than forty bills and joint resolutions were introduced in Congress, was a law finally signed proclaiming "The Star Spangled Banner" to be the national anthem of the United States.
A "drinking song", yet should be of a Godly manner. LOL
- 6 votes
Hello, all. I really do enjoy and often encourage a good debate such as this. Just the mere fact that we CAN discuss these issues is what makes our country so great!
There is something that I need to correct you on, however.
John Adams, who was the son-in-law of a preacher, wrote to his wife after the opening day of Congress on September 7, 1774, and explained to her that on the opening day they had prayer that lasted for THREE hours. He also stated in the letter that they had Bible study (in Congress) out of Psalm 35 and 36 and it built their faith to the point that for the first time they actually believed they could defeat the British in the upcoming battle.
Also, now while I will acknowledge that Benjamin Franklin was probably our least religious founding father, he holds the distinction of being one of only six members of our Founding Fathers who signed both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Franklin was an original member of Congress when they had the opening prayers on the first day and every session of Congress for the next 11 years when they drafted the Constitution.
On June 28, 1787, in a speech to Congress that was recorded by Congress (as every speech even to this day is) Franklin quoted scripture and among other things stated "The longer I live the more convincing proof I see that God governs in the affairs of men. If a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?...I therefore proceed to move that, henceforth, prayer be held in this Assembly every morning before we proceed to business."
Not bad for an atheist, huh?
I suggest that anyone reading this should go to the public library and see for themselves all the speeches and letters that were recorded in those early days of the birth of our nation. It really is fascinating.
- 6 votes
Thank you jafo,
Nicely put. I would like to add a few small points. I see people decorate with things that are dear to their heart. Hunters like out door scenes, sports buffs like sports memorabilia, etc. you get the idea. Keeping this in mind one has only to walk the halls of congress, the supreme court building or look at any of the capitol buildings from the early years of our country to see what occupied the founders minds. Nearly every surface is engraved with something and way more than half are scenes or scriptures from the Bible. It is very obvious that Jehova God (for the religiously illiterate that would be the God of the Jews) and his son Jesus Christ were very much on the founder's minds and hearts.
The real answer to the question "Who does it hurt to have God on our money?" Is really very simple. Seeing God's name is very painful to those who choose to deny God, for it is a constant reminder to them the consequences of their choice. You see they love their own desires more than their future so they deny God whom they see as condemning them. The real pity is that God does not condemn them, he simply want to protect them and show them how to have the fullest life possible.
- 2 votes
Thomas Jefferson was not a framer of the Constitution. "Separation of church and state" was coined more than 10 years after the First Amendment was adopted. It was a phrase in a letter from Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association dated January 1, 1802, in response to a letter in which they were concerned that RELIGIOUS LIBERTY MIGHT BE INFRINGED BY THE GOVERNMENT. Jefferson responded that this would not occur because the Constitution builds "a wall of separation between Church and State."
A large private collection of Founders' letters, Bibles and handwritten notes includes a Bible printed by authorization of Congress FOR USE IN SCHOOLS. Where is the separation?
- 1 vote
"We the people" was a phrase to denote a distinction from governments run by kings and queens. Ever since Madlyn Murray O'Hairbrain become involved IQ's have dropped in the public school system.
- 2 votes
Thank you, phawk, for reminding me of another important issue...
We always hear about people who are trying to remove God from our society (i.e. schools, government buildings, money, etc.) and these same people are usually the ones who don't believe in God. Well, if God doesn't exist, then what I would like is for someone to please explain to me why there is such a push to remove any reference to Him? And if He truly doesn't exist, then why aren't these same people filing lawsuits to remove Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny or (my favorite) The Tooth Fairy?
The answer is really quite simple, guys. If there is no God to remind us that we are accountable for our actions, then (in their minds) there is no accountability. You can do as you please without paying any penalties.
Also, thank you too, Blessed American, for pointing out that the very first textbook ever printed in this country for use in our schools was indeed none other than the Bible. In 1782, the U.S. Congress authorized AND printed 20,000 bibles "For the use of our schools". Now, I realize that this is getting off on a different subject, but if our Founding Fathers were so in favor of "separation of church and state" then why in the world didn't they stop it? Why was it constitutional for over 160 years before the Supreme Court ruled against it? Even better yet, why would CONGRESS print bibles to be used in our schools? Clearly, the intent of our founding fathers was not to have any "separation between church and state". By the way, that phrase doesn't appear one time in the entire Constitution and was never even mentioned at the Constitutional Convention in 1789.
- 3 votes
If there is no God to remind us that we are accountable for our actions, then (in their minds) there is no accountability. You can do as you please without paying any penalties.
This is your take. My take is this:
Christianity permits "third party forgiveness".
The Christian can do whatever the hell he wants. The priest can molest all his alter boys. The gang-banger can do a drive-by on his way home from church. The leaders of these mega-churches can skim tons of money from the tithes. The snotty self-absorbed snob can isolate his/her gay relative into feelings of suicide. When you feel the guilt, just ask for forgiveness... at least now you know your still going to heaven. The priest doesn't have to confront the 9 yr old boy he raped... doesn't even have to ask forgiveness from the destroyed young boy's parents. Just ask jebus.
If I transgress against a neighbor... I know there is no third party to forgive me. I have to crawl back to the person I wronged. Look them in the eye to explain my actions.
So go back to your child molesting and forgiving yourself for it. These are not the values I want my children to learn. I want them to learn to be accountable to their fellow man. So keep your "easy way outs" off our money.
- 3 votes
I would say you need to step back and use the same intelligence you use defending your position on the phrase "In God We Trust" as you do to attack religious people. If you really understood Christianity you would know that there is accountability. It is society that takes accountability out of the equation. Christianity calls for forgiveness, but also calls for repentance and not to continue in sin. Christ tells us that we if we have committed a sin towards a brother, we must go to him first to square things, then to God for forgiveness. Deuteronomy tells us that a murder will have to confront the soul he killed in the next life. There is no third party escape, and in the end we are held accountable for what we do. Yes, by the grace of Christ, who suffered for us, we are forgiven, but the forgiveness is based on repentance, and the desire to not continue the sin. Your hatefulness towards all people of faith seems to be blinded by the actions of some. If that is the case, then I feel sorry for you, since there is no place for you to live in this world, since all the things you just mentioned are committed by those who do not believe in a god also. Therefore I do not see where you will get the values to raise your children.
- 3 votes
Watch and read The American Heritage Series and then ask yourself who were Christians and how they drafted this nation upon it!!!!! Sure there is a separation of church and state but that does not remove faith, religion and God from anything. It is our heritage whether unbelievers like it or not! The fact that so many radicals are ignoring the truth is their privilege, however, it is a fact that America was founded for religious AND political freedom!!! Embrace it, fight for it and preserve it or we will fall into a nation you will not want to live in....or what is left of it when the evil that has pushed it's way in is through. No matter how, when or where the truth is truth and God reigns and is victorious over all that is evil....we are to stand up for what is right and lead the rest in freedoms of all types, whether we agree with each other or not; we should agree to preserve our nation in unity!
- 1 vote
WONDERFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jack Huang has joined the fray - now ya'll read his post because he knows everything about everything, and will straighten all of you'ens out!!! To David, my name is NINA - since you don't think any of us will state our names. All I can tell any of you is you can not take God out of anything or any place. I doubt he is impressed being mentioned on our dirty money. No one is required to believe in, hear about, care about or any thing else - God. You can not take prayer out of any place - a person can pray in silence. We can worship in silence. So much yapping here - one insulting the intelligence of another, the list goes on. I am a christian and the best thing I can do for my God is to live in a manner others will not have to ask about my beliefs. With all the information available now there is no need to try to force god on any one. Now I will irritate other "believers". The churches should NOT BE TAX EXEMPT. Tithes and church property should be taxed just like every thing else. If you want true separation of church and state (whatever you all decide that is), then treat the church like any other business.
God doesn't need any tax breaks, and he does not need those who deny he exists. All have the decided advantage of free will - so exercise it and quit making nasty remarks regarding the intelligence or lack thereof of each other. Most of us have an IQ of at least 4 or 5!!.
- 1 vote
Oklahoma mom wrote:
"This quotes you are using are taken completely out of context and used by the liberal left media to brain wash Americans"
Talking about brain washing... what do you think CCD is? I'm willing to bet you send your kids there, so their poor minds can be trampled with the repeated phrase that God exists and in charge of everything. The phrase has to be repeated over and over again, or no person in their right mind will ever believe it. That is definitely brainwashing. Yet, lots of those brainwashed kids will still wake up one day, and realize that there is no, and never has been, a God. What CCD and the church is trying to get those kids to believe, is such nonsense, that even all that brainwashing cannot always stop them from seeing the truth.
So if you are sending your kids to CCD, you are not allowed to accuse anyone from brainwashing another, as you do the same thing yourself.
Jafo, I am not pushing to remove, nor do I feel threatened at all by seeing the phrase, "In God we trust" in places. It just makes me giggle to think that there are still so many people who think there really is a God. Wishful thinking I guess. It would be nice if there was, but just because we'd like something to be true, that doesn't make it so. Wake up and be realistic!
You're talking about Santa, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy in comparison with God. You are so right! They are all one and the same. Made up to appease kids/people so they won't ask too many questions!
- 1 vote
A little history lesson will explain to you why the founding fathers wanted separation of church and state. In the Virginia Colony, the taxpayers had to support the Church of England with their taxes whether they wanted to or not, and the only ministers that could preach within the Colony were those ordained by either the Church of England or the Presbyterian Church. In fact, all of the founding fathers from Virginia were practicing Christians with strong beliefs in God. This includes Thomas Jefferson, which many people want to believe was a deist but not a Christian. A closer look at his life will show you that he was a very strong believer in Jesus as the Son of God. He, however, was not a member of either the Church of England or the Presbyterian Church, so he wanted the freedom not to financially support either one of them, and he wanted everyone else to have that freedom. You will note that the admendment to the Constitution specifically says the the Government will do nothing to restrict the freedom of religion. Unfortunately, many people in the USA today want to do exactly that.
- 1 vote
"One of the embarrassing problems for the early nineteenth-century champions of the Christian faith was that not one of the first six Presidents of the United States was an orthodox Christian." (Mortimer Adler, 1902- , American philosopher and educator, ed. "Chapter 22: Religion and Religious Groups in America," The Annals of America: Great Issues in American Life, Vol. II, Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1968, p. 420.)
You know the phrase, but can you define Orthodox Christian or what orthodoxy means without looking it up? I doubt it. Most Christians do not fall under the category of Orthodox. The Founding Fathers wanted Christian freedom, not orthodoxy.
In principle, our country was founded by Christian's who were trying to escape persecution. Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian values and in no way was it intended to be an atheist country. Those with small minds cannot believe in anything that makes them wrong, or in better terms, not a God. Darwin died a Christian, and said, after looking at the human eye, that it would be a mistake of great magnitude to believe that there was not a creator. While I understand people issue with it, these are the same people, in large part, that think it is OK to give my daughter an abortion without my consultation, teach gay marriage as normal family values, and literally pee on everything that I and the MAJORITY of our Country believes in. So I do not feel the least bit of sadness for their plight. Who is pushing values and beliefs on who? That is the greater question here, isn't it ?
- 1 vote
Show me anywhere in the Constitution of the United States where is says there shall be a separation of Church and State. It is NOt a constitutional issue.
- 1 vote
jafo said:
We always hear about people who are trying to remove God from our society (i.e. schools, government buildings, money, etc.) and these same people are usually the ones who don't believe in God. Well, if God doesn't exist, then what I would like is for someone to please explain to me why there is such a push to remove any reference to Him? And if He truly doesn't exist, then why aren't these same people filing lawsuits to remove Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny or (my favorite) The Tooth Fairy?
Exactly jafo! It is quite ridiculous! I am an atheist, but not due to lack of exposure to Christianity and that side of things, but by choice. There is no reason to squelch the belief system of anyone. I choose to believe that there is not a God, it is still a belief, not fact. Everyone needs to make that choice for themselves and telling the majority of the nation that they can not post their beliefs in public view is simply trying to hide a major aspect of life from those that choose not to believe in it. It doesn't make any sense.
As for the rest of your post, in my opinion, you go a little down hill and off into another area. But I can't help but fully agree with your first paragraph, quote above. Well said!
I understand where you are coming from; however, if the churches would come out against all that is wrong in America at this point in time, and all that has gone wrong in the past, perhaps this mess would not be so painful.
In God We Trust is a motto and mottos do not inflict themselves on any of us personally; we were established under a Christian flag as a result of the European fleeing the same dispensation of freedoms that we are fighting to keep now. All your forefathers were Christians, my people, helped the European surive here in the beginning. We had a God we worshipped but the difference was we worshipped our God everyday, and several times a day, not just one hour a week, one day a week. Every State's Preamble acknowledges God in the first few lines and that is not wrong. It is one of the many statements that have kept America strong until now. When moral fibre is lost, when good/decency, etc. are banished and when common sense is buried, then, and as now, we are in trouble and the other nations are laughing at the potential of our fall bringing Americans to their knees.
- 1 vote
jafo
The answer is really quite simple, guys. If there is no God to remind us that we are accountable for our actions, then (in their minds) there is no accountability. You can do as you please without paying any penalties.
We do still have law and we still do have a conscience. At least I do, not so sure about others. I do good not because I'm bribed into it, threaten ed into it, or because I'm guilted into it. I do good because... that's me! I'm accountable to me and I don't liek the person I'd be if I just did a bunch of evil stuff. When I do things, I accep the consequences whatever they may be.
- 3 votes
WRONG. They all believed and did include their believe in God and all aspects of government business.
Do you have any references to prove that?
Violation of Church and State? Are you serious?
There's one thing seriously wrong with this, and it's the fact that the Federal Reserve (who creates and controls the US currency supply) is a private, I repeat, PRIVATE institution.
They are not an operative of the State and thus are not subject to its jurisdiction.
They can do whatever they see fit.
- 3 votes
The Federal Reserve is not a private entity. It was created by Congress and is an agency of the US Government.
The actual production of coins and dollars is controlled by the Bureau of Printing and Engraving, which is part of the Department of the Treasury, which, I think you'll agree is not a private institution.
Design of our currency is handled through acts of Congress, which I think you'll agree is not a private institution.
- 14 votes
The Federal Reserve System (also the Federal Reserve; informally The Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. Created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, it is a quasi-public (government entity with private components) banking system[1] composed of (1) the presidentially appointed Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.; (2) the Federal Open Market Committee; (3) 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation acting as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury, each with its own nine-member board of directors; (4) numerous private U.S. member banks, which subscribe to required amounts of non-transferable stock in their regional Federal Reserve Banks; and (5) various advisory councils. As of 2008, Ben Bernanke serves as the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Where the confusion and conspiracy comes from is that The first misconception that most people have is that the Federal Reserve Bank is a branch of the US government. Its a private entitity monitored by the government and at times has had government officials working within it (which goes on to other conspiracies that seem rather true). Even the Constitution says that the Federal Reserve Bank shouldn't exist in the fashion that it does.
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress:
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures
The Federal Reserve Bank only being a pseudo-government branch is a violation of this Article.
Others have written stuff about the evils of the Federal Reserve but being as the FRB isnt the main topic nor is the workings and misgivings of FRB I'll just cite a single source as food for thought.
- 5 votes
"In god we trust"
Well there are so many gods out there... So pretty much that line points out that YOU ARE allowed to believe in any GOD. It doesn't say 'In Christian god" or "In Hindu god". Just god we trust. I'm saying no we shouldn't change it because it has historical meaning to this country, and if you ever paid attention in school you would know that you can't change history, that phrase is always going to be there. Then congress has to think about how to enforce such a law... O.k. change the books, then... hmmm can't do much after that. If you don't like the way something looks, then just skip the part and let everyone else say it.
And for the atheist out there, is not god just a belief. And if you believe in no god does that not mean you believe in something. I'm not saying Christianity (any form) is the only religion to have a god, there is no form of religion in our current government system is what ever one the men and women who run our country happen to believe in at the time.
But hey its just one opinion from an educated kid.
- 1 vote
Putting your atrocious grammar, lack of coherence, and other general errors aside, I would like to point out that Atheism is not a belief. Atheism is the lack of a belief; meaning we do not worship any "God" and we certainly do not trust one.
- 16 votes
You will also have to not capitalize the G in God if you want it the mean something else. Almost like "depend on what the definition of IS is". It would be in court for years
- 2 votes
VehoNex:
Just a little food for thought. Do you think that any candidate who seeks office, if running as an "Atheist", would stand a chance of being elected?
I submit that many are being "Played"!
- 1 vote
Vehonex - So you woudl be happy to change it to other names for your god like Allah?
God is Santa Clause for Grown ups.
- 1 vote
I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Some things are better left alone and i believe this is one of them. If it offends you then their are other countries to live in, go there and try to change their money. :) Move on to the real issues concerning this country and quit whining about God on our money, if you don't believe in Him then it shouldn't bother you as the money will spend the same. Have a good day and God bless America!!!!!!!
- 5 votes
You are right some things are best left alone.
Of course you could be bothered to do a google search for "original pledge of allegiance" and actually find out the truth.
From said google search:
-----
The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931). It was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September 8, 1892. Bellamy had hoped that the pledge would be used by citizens in any country.
In its original form it read:
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1923, the words, "the Flag of the United States of America" were added. At this time it read:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we say today. Bellamy's daughter objected to this alteration. Today it reads:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
------
So therefore by your logic we definitely need to take "under god" out from the pledge since it was never in the origninal.
Could we ad something better. We already had. From Wikipedia
---
E pluribus unum is Latin for "Out of Many, One." Never codified by law, it was considered a de facto motto of the United States until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H.J. Resolution 396), adopting In God We Trust as the official motto
---
So next time you could do a bit of research, the above took less than 10 minutes, before you spout some opinion that clearly shows your ignorance.
- 22 votes
I agree with RC , better left alone. But Attila is totally correct about the Pledge of Allegiance.....I'm old enough to remember reciting it the old way and also about our Motto.
What irritates me with all this is everyone getting in an uproar, plus if one believes in God, it doesn't necessarily mean a Christian God........maybe like our native Americans, just that there is a supreme being and he/she is everywhere and in everything. Or not.
- 2 votes
plus if one believes in God, it doesn't necessarily mean a Christian God........maybe like our native Americans, just that there is a supreme being and he/she is everywhere and in everything. Or not.
Right, because all of humanity believes in a monotheistic religion. Not even Native Americans do, actually. not by a long shot.
- 10 votes
I darned sure don't believe in any god. Please don't put your god in my government, thank you very much.
- 10 votes
Attila,
You are correct.
I am descendant of Francis Bellamy.
I know the history of that well.
In the 'olden days" much faith was adhered to and assumed throughout society, through fear of the unknown. They needed something for the people to trust in and hang on to. When that trust and faith is removed the society is left with fear and void which cannot be filled with science. We are all mortal.
The point in question is: Should that particular phrase be removed?
For those that do not wish to believe; what does it hurt in you?
And for the ones that chose to believe; What do those words mean to you?
- 2 votes
With God as our father , why would we want to remove his name from our currency. As many others have said ' If you dont like it Find another country to harrass', this nation is one nation under god as it should be. So get over it ! Behave yourselves
- 1 vote
With God as our father , why would we want to remove his name from our currency. As many others have said ' If you dont like it Find another country to harrass', this nation is one nation under god as it should be. So get over it ! Behave yourselves
I am glad that some of you have never had anything happen to you that brought you to your knees! I pray for your sakes that you DO have to, so that Gd will become very real to you....sad that you would wait for such a time to get to know Him but if that is the only way...so be it. The point that should be made here is: God created all of us, the world and all in it. You can choose to believe or not, but He loves you and wants you to be saved from Hell. Jesus died for everyone one of us and sin has been paid for~ for all time for everyone of us; that is how much He loves us! Now, we can wrangle on forever about what is what to whom, but the fact is God is God and will continue as He has since the beginning, whether anyone listens or not. Thankfully there are more of us who do and continue to offer the truth, as He has asked us to. The Bible is the inherent word of God, it is the only truth. Of course there are all sorts of beliefs but man came up with them, not God. He is not concerned with what false prophets, atheists and what satan comes up with because He has already won the battle against evil. There is going to be a multitude more of all the harshness, cruelty, death and destruction that has befallen the world in most recent years......we will probably keep fighting among ourselves until we blow this world up and all that will accomplish is: we will go home to heaven and the rest will go to hell.....simple as that. Where do you want to spend eternity? Challenge yourself, seek the truth, open your minds and hearts...it really is wonderful! God loves you! PS: no we are perfect, we are very imperfect and that is why we need his love and grace.....we cannot do it all alone no matter how smart we are....we are sheep!
- 1 vote
Well put Ruth. I would like to add if you don't mind. It seems that everyones "rights" are being "violated" lately. The whole seperation of church and state has been severly twisted over the years. It is NOT about keeping church out of state but just the opposite. Our country was base on religious beliefs, since then we have let things get way out of hand. As a Born Again Christian and a follower of the only GOD, i have been finding myself and those that are "on the same page" being persecuted and we are now the minority. MERRY CHRISTMAS is not and offensive phrase but every year the retailers tell their employees that they must only say "Happy Holidays". I AM OFFENDED THAT JESUS' BIRTHDAY COULD POSSIBLY BE OFFENSIVE! IF HE AND gOD ARE NOT REAL THEN WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT TO SHUT THEM OUT OF GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL AND THE HOLIDAYS THAT THEY CREATED? I love the lord. If your opinion varies that is your option but the old saying that if it aint broke, dont fix it goes a long way here.
- 1 vote
"I may grow rich by an art I am compelled to follow; I may recover health by medicines I am compelled to take against my own judgment; but I cannot be saved by a worship I disbelieve and abhor." (Thomas Jefferson, notes for a speech, c. 1776. From Gorton Carruth and Eugene Ehrlich, eds., The Harper Book of American Quotations, New York: Harper & Row, 1988, p. 498.)
Dear rc,
Those who came to this land we love, came at great price and hardship, they put their faith in their God (Christopher Columbus) was ridiculed by many of his day for believing the world was round. Columbus said he found the reason and wisdom in the Scriptures and pressed through criticism and rebuke. To make that men and women of deep Faith are intellectually inferior or wimps, etc. is not factual and you would have to have alot of faith in spoken ignorance and disregard of history.
Read more History, especially about those who brought US to this great country and compiled it's Law.
God Bless,
Therese
I think this is awful to even be talking about.It should always be on there.Even our president is sworn in under GOD.I am not A jesus freek but I do beleive in religeon.I do think everyone should have the right to choose if they want to beleive or not but I dont think it hurts anyone for it to be on anything
- 1 vote
So you would have no problem changing it to "In Allah we Trust"? or to "In FSM we Trust"?
Of course everyone should have the right to choose if they believe or not. However forcing the belief onto those who choose not to believe should not be allowed to happen.
As far as my limited knowledge goes, and if you are referring to POTUS being sworn in on the bible, there is no law only a tradition. He/She could just as legitimately be sworn in on a copy of the Q'uran, or the Book of Mormon, or an issue of Playboy. I may be wrong about that, and if i am that it something else that needs to be changed, why should you not be allowed a Muslim, Jewish or Atheist President.
I much prefer the system we have here in the UK, were religion is allowed (of course) but not mentioned in politics, and if it is done so there is a huge backlash, whether the speaker was for or against it. Americans always seem to remember Tony Blair, he was PM for 10 years and never once answered a question about his religion, and yet now he is an adamant catholic and has set up various faith based initiatives.
- 10 votes
but I dont think it hurts anyone for it to be on anything
so then it wouldn't hurt anyone if it was removed, right?
- 3 votes
The founding fathers did not see fit to print this religious graffitti on their currency.
I wonder how that could be possible if all the bible thumpers are right?
This is not a trick question.
- 8 votes
But they signed it on thier documents, and they all have chosen to be sworn-in in such a method. Right
- 1 vote
Dude, if you could spell, I might give a bit of weight to your opinion.
- 3 votes
Dude? Come on. You get on someone for misspelling a word and call them Duke?
And, "Dude, if you could spell, I might give a bit of weight to your opinion."
How do you "give a bit or weight" to someone?
Pompous fanny!
I believe churches should pay taxes like everyone else. WOW! That's it. I'll start a church and get out of taxes. With all the money I'll have, I'll be able to buy TV and Radio time to build my congregation, there by, building my income. Maybe I can use it to get in the back door of congress, maybe I can get a couple favors in the way of congregational support. If I get a politician to attend my church........I'm in! By "god", that's it!
Bubba - how do you figure that the President is sworn in "under GOD"? The Presidential oath is in the Constitution, Article II:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
That's it. No mention of God.
- 12 votes
True...the oath was not written with the words "so help me God." That phrase was added by one of our supposedly "secular" Presidents - George Washington, when he took the oath. He realized that he could not do the job without God's help. If people would take the time to read the writings of MOST of our founding fathers, they would realize that the one source quoted more than any other document by these forward-thinking, sage men was the Bible - not the Koran or any other religious book. I am not claiming that all of our founders were Christians, and certainly, many of them were from different denominations; but I do claim that the very foundation of our laws and our civilization come from the precepts found in the Bible. WHY can't we kill or steal? Where do people think these concepts originated? Take a look at the Ten Commandments. And while our founders were serious about the freedom of religion (notice it is the very first freedom put into writing in the Bill of Rights), they NEVER intended for their descendants to turn that amendment around to be freedom FROM religion. Face it, people! Whether you like it or not, our country was not founded by a majority of non-religious people. Read about our founders! You will find that in that their personal letters to each other, they often talked of God and religion. Although Washington himself was not an overly religious man, I believe by what I have read from his own hand that he was a man of faith in God. In Washington's farewell address, he stated:
"Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric ?"
Even a Frenchman visiting our country in its early years (Alexis deToqueville) noted: "Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith."
Do I think "In God We Trust" should be on all our currency? Well, I'm torn on that. Because, you see, while I do believe that we have (and always have had) a largely Christian nation, I don't know that that statement is overly true anymore. God has become a talking point in our culture - well, in what's left of our culture. We use Him as a label or an argument; and I don't know that we can really call our nation a Christian nation anymore. I'd like to be able to say that we live in a Christian nation, but Christians have been so complacent for so long that I believe all hope is gone for this country to return to the core beliefs that shaped it into a great nation of prosperity. I believe that God is removing His hand of blessing, and that we remaining Christians are seeing the fruits of our lack of zeal for the souls around us.
I'll leave you with yet another quote, this one by Patrick Henry (you know, the "give me liberty or give me death" guy): "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ."
I couldn't have said it better myself, Mr. Henry. Thank you!
- 5 votes
Bama girl, give me a source for that quote. I'm a descendant of Patrick Henry, and I've never heard of that before. I don't believe he said that for a minute.
- 3 votes
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ."
The quote is a fake. google it....
- 8 votes
Here, I'll save people the trouble... Religious Quotes That Never Were.
- 9 votes
Religion should take step back in the public view. It will only lead to problems later. Look at the theocracies around the world and see the issues they have. It sickens me to think my kids have to grow up with this burden. Remove it from the money and the pledge. Build that wall high and strong, because who knows. One day, we may have to answer to sharia law.
- 6 votes
Chris,
The only reason it is in the public view is due to the constant assaults on the religious person's mental aptitude for believing in God. We feel we must defend ourselves at every turn, because people like you would like to eradicate religion. When a Christian shows his flaws in public, it is in the news. When someone without belief "sins", its business as usual and the secular world shrugs its shoulders saying "expected, no big deal." What burden is it your children have to grow up with? Obey your parents? Don't murder, covet, lie? Your children will spend their money as you do to buy the precious things and necessary things in their lives. I'm sure when you buy that burger at Wendy's, your thinking, "I'm a hypocrite for using this tainted God money." Doubtful. You go through your life spending and buying with very little thought of what's printed on it. Maybe to make sure you didn't overpay. But I tell you what, just take that dirty money out of your pockets and wallet and give it to the needy.
- 3 votes
BlueCollarGuy: only reason it is in the public view is due to the constant assaults on the religious person's mental aptitude for believing in God
This is valid criticism. People who are willing to beleive someting completely based on what their parents and pastor tell is self delusional. When they ignore scientific evidence that is delsuional to a manic level. If these people then try to make public policy it is a dnagerous state of affairs.
We recently had a politician claiming the earth was 6000 years old in a discusion about uranium mining! This is scary to those of us who think logically.
- 1 vote
After all the years with it being on money is stepping on someone rights, please give me a break. People are coming into our country and do not believe like we do, wanting to change how our country is run.
If we allow you to come here than accept our way of life, leaving your country belief behind or do not come and live here. Now I can care less what is written on our money, but feel the citizens of this country is being step on for a few idiots that should not even be here period. I bet the people would also believe in honor killing, which I do not understand how a father could kill one of his children.
We do not have to change the way our country have been for over two hundred years just to please the new comer to our country, or someone who change the way they believe. This is the United State and our country have been great for we have all work together to build this country and we will not allow anyone to take our belief away from us. Believe me if our country hasn't help and send aid money to many other country they would really be hurting, do not bite the hand that feed you.
- 1 vote
jdl:
Why would Americans opposed to "In God We Trust" support honor killings? That makes no sense at all. If you look at the poll results, over 100,000 people have voted "Yes". I bet that very few of them support honor killings. I don't. Nor do I understand how a father could kill one of his children. Most Christians should understand though, Abraham came close to sacrificing his son.
I am not a newcomer. My parents, grandparents, and 7 of 8 great-grandparents were born in the US. Your false assumptions are mind-boggling.
Now, "In God We Trust" was not on any of our money until the 1860s. There was no law requiring it on all money until the 1950s. Our Founding Fathers gave more respect to the separation of church and state than we do today. You hardly have 200 years of history on your side.
Because everyone born in the U.S.A. believes as you do, jdl? You're turning this into an immigration issue... it's not even close.
"We do not have to change the way our country have been for over two hundred years just to please the new comer to our country, or someone who change the way they believe."
The phrase hasn't been there for 200 years.
I don't understand why people say that immigrants are coming to this country looking to make this change from "In God We Trust."
My family has been here over 250 years, there is a large town on the East Coast with my family's last name (yes, it's just one tracable family line). I am also religiously observant.
But I think that it's very clear that adding God to money and the pledge was done in the 1950s. Anyone denying that? Should we be doing all the things we did in the 1950s? Not everything our country did at that time was the right thing, and we don't hold on to all the same practices...so why can't this practice be questioned?
The problem I see is that when it is questioned by those who feel, when they see God on the same items that show images of our Presidents and monuments, they are being told they aren't really American citizens...that conservitaves AGREE they aren't "really" American citizens! That somehow speaking up for changes is anti-American, and if they don't like it, they can just leave.
Isn't that the mindset that our founding fathers abandoned in England, and strove to not replicate?
- 1 vote
It isn't just immigrants that this offends. There are a great many natural-born Americans, some whose families have have been here since the foundation of the country, who think that we're better off without this on our money.
I notice that the people who are dead set on this motto tend to ignore anyone who points out that this is a relatively recent phenomenon. In fact, it is a relic of one of the darkest periods of American history. (Can it be a relic if we're still in the darkness?) And while I would not necessarily put this on the same level with arguments over the Confederate battle flag, the spirit at the heart of the matter is similar: "This is our heritage, so if you don't like it, leave!" Well, news flash: It's not our heritage--it is the exact opposite, in fact. No matter what your prejudices, be they racial, ethnic, religious, or whatever, to codify them into law should be anathema to Americans. But yet, a large number of Americans do in fact subscribe to one or the other of these. Christians, particularly, seem to love freedom of religion, as long as it's their religion.
I recently attended a July 4 church service where the first half was spent celebrating our freedom to worship as our conscience dictates, then the second half was spent making fun of another religion. Fine. If we want to poke fun at another religion, or criticize another belief, then I believe we have that right. But if you do that, and then scream persecution when someone criticizes your belief--that makes you a hypocrite.
Same thing here. If your view is that this is fine because it reflects my belief, or because it reflects the beliefs of the "majority," I will call you out as a hypocrite the first time I hear you talk about how great freedom of religion is. Otherwise, you make me look bad.
Besides, when they included it on the coinage, they left off the whole phrase: "In God We Trust--But We Still Build Nuclear Weapons."
Put this national shame to rest--get it off the money, out of the pledge, and make the country whole again.
- 8 votes
The only thing you said that makes any sense is "make the country whole again." I agree totally with this statement. Put prayer back in our schools. I do not understand why people want to change our heritage.
Your comment about "still in the darkness" will really come true, if you get your way. This country would truly be in the darkness without God in our daily lives.
Put this nation shame to rest--leave our national motto on our money, leave it in out pledge, and put prayer back in school.
- 6 votes
But that's the point. The country can't be whole when you exclude everyone who doesn't believe the same narrow idea of God you do.
- 7 votes
OK- I am a Christian. I am on staff at a church. The comments are correct, removing " In God We Trust" from our currency is not going to hurt ANYONE. It has been printed that way, Why? For haw long? Why the need to change it now? It does not change your rights. You work for it and spend it every day. If it was not printed on there the Christians would not be fighting for it to be printed on there. But it is there, why? Who's idea? It does not change your freedom's. You don't get more if you believe in God. Why does this argument exist. Let's find away to not spend $4.00 for a gallon of gas
- 3 votes
I agree totally with this statement. Put prayer back in our schools. I do not understand why people want to change our heritage.
Separation of church and state is part of our heritage, whether you like it or not.
Put this nation shame to rest--leave our national motto on our money, leave it in out pledge, and put prayer back in school.
The national motto that was invented in the 1950's to simply declare "hey, we're so not commies!"
Ah yes, so very traditionally American.
- 4 votes
It never fails, someone always brings up the "prayer in schools" issue. No one seems to understand.
The supreme court DID NOT ban prayer in schools nor take prayer out of the schools. Look at the origins. When the colonies were formed in this country, Baptists settled here, Methodists there, etc. and so on. In each community, the schools were typically run by the churches, so each community learned in school consistent with the predominant religion of the community.
As the nation grew, and we had public schools, more integration in the communities regarding religious beliefs (or not), each community no longer had one predominant religion, it was only a matter of time that the supreme court would finally rule that the schools (read government) cannot dictate a specific religion.
That is all the court did, is to say that the school cannot lead or control the religious beliefs since there was no longer a common ground. It has even been upheld in the supreme court, that anyone with religious convictions can include their beliefs in discussions, classwork, assignments, etc. as long as they are not proselytizing.
Any school that has extracurricular activity groups (chess club, math club, etc.) must also allow religious or bible groups as well, if there is interest in such a group.
It is only the narrow minded and the atheists that interpret this to mean anything religious was banned from schools. The bottom line is this. It is a parent's responsibility to establish religious foundations, the child's responsibility to accept or reject, and if there is no prayer in schools, it is because the children no longer take it there.
But how many students still say, "Oh God, I hope I passed that test!"
- 1 vote
Sorry, Jack. There is no such thing as "separation of church and state."
Charles Carroll - signer of the Declaration of Independence | Portrait of Charles Carroll
" Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure...are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments." [Source: To James McHenry on November 4, 1800.]
- 1 vote
I see a simple resolution to the whole issue-----Let the people vote on it!! One point that noone can argue is that in this country THE MAJORITY RULES!!!
- 1 vote
I certainly agree about letting the people vote! then no one side can say WE didn't get our way! Boo Hoo!!!!! I don't think it is just immigrants that are taking away God, in fact I believe it is those born and raised here! What I don't get is how an atheist can complain that we are shoving God at them and that violates their rights, yet when Christians complain that taking God away is a violation of their rights they are being labeled as judgemental
- 1 vote
There ya go!! Cast your votes!It's the way we Do things here in the good ole USA!! Take all these bible thumpers like me out of the equation completely, let's just vot on it!!! Way to go!!!
i think god should be removed,but more importantly the bloodsucking banksters in the fed should be removed.they are probably more dangerous.
- 1 vote
You say you want the words "In God We Trust" removed from our currency but you did not state why you feel this way or believe this.
Some times I feel as though people just want to follow the crowd but not for their beliefs, just to be accepted. I am not saying that this is what you are doing but I do feel that some folks just follow suit because they feel it is easier.
I however will NEVER agree with the removal of any thing that has to do with my God and Saviors name. And because I am an American I have the Freedom and right to feel that way. Just as you have the right to feel the way you do. I beleive that Jesus Christ died on the cross to saves us from oursleves and our sins. It is my job as a Christian to let everone know that they can choose to worship and beleive in God. It is my job to let them know that their souls may be saved from eternal Hell and Damnation. You may choose to listen and believe or turn your head and go the other way. And that is your right to do so, but I would not be a good Christian if I did not do as the Lord ask me to do, which is let you know that you have a choice. What you choose to do with the information is up to you. My job is done. But I would not be a good Christian if I just set idly by and let those who do not know God take away our Freedom as Americans to worship whom we choose.
I think people take the words "seperation of church and state" out of context. You see our country was founded by men and women who fleed to this country in search of a place they could live and be free of tirants and people to tell us who we will or will not worship. It was created to keep the State out of our business when it came to going to church or worship. We founded this country on the basis that we as Americans can worship, God, Jesus, Alla, Balla,
Buddism, Judism and etc. So those of you who do not beleive in a higher power and do not worship can go right on doing so. But don't take away from those of us who chose to. They created this statement so they may keep the Government out of their business when it come to going to church. What ever church that may be. Do we have to back in history and re-think what the German folks went through when Hitler enslaved and burned all the jews. In my book that is discrimination. The Christians aren't discriminating against the athiest, so why do the athiest disriminate against us; We are all Americans? We are becoming divided and if we are not careful the terrorist will hit us when we least expect it because we are to busy fighting amongst ourselves instead of being "United. Think about it, the statement is so True; "United WE Stand-Divided We Fall!"
Please keep the words on our currency do to this nation needs to be united and love one another no matter what each of us believe. I don't know you and I may never know you but I do know that you are my brother or sister in Christ and a fellow American who I have no doubt loves their country as much as I love mine. On that I am sure we can agree.
Let's leave these the words on currancy alone and work together on getting rid of child abusers, molesters, murderers, theirves and etc. The things that really hurt us and fellow americans. I don't think that those words have hurt anyone or kept them from spending the money but those bad people have directly or indirectly hurt us all.
May God Bless you and all of us in all of our indevours and keep us safe from all harm.
- 1 vote
Shadowmeister, you say "The Christians aren't discriminating against the athiest, so why do the athiest disriminate against us; We are all Americans?" Well, I feel that when the national currency contains references to belief in God in the first person -" In God WE Trust" - that it does discriminate against atheists, because atheists are not part of that "we." When the pledge of allegiance describes our nation as "Under God, indivisible," I am made to feel that I can't be a real American if I don't believe in God. Just as the Bill of Rights provides freedom of religion, it provides freedom FROM religion - Americans are free to choose not to believe, too. And yet these phrases elevating God in our patriotic celebrations (and our supposedly secular currency) make it seem as if one can't be both atheist and patriot.
- 1 vote
This continues to be a controversial issue, but the truth is that whether you want to believe it or not, this country has been made great by its continuity. It has continued the adherence to basic morals that are found in the religious writings of Christianity and Judaism. It certainly doesn't matter if you believe in the God that these two religions were established to worship. What matters is that you believe in those basic moral grounds on which this country from its earliest days of settlement was established upon. Imagine a country that was based on the beliefs or excuse me unbelief of an atheist. What exactly would you base your laws and morality upon. Personal conviction? What would drive that conviction? If you believe in nothing, there is nothing to which you are accountable.
There is no reason to remove these four words. They are a constant reminder of what our country was founded upon. Please study real American History and find the proof of what really made this country great. It was its continuity in believing in something bigger than itself. If we remove God from every area of government and public life we will have lowered ourselves to the standards of immoral countries and governments. We will lose our freedoms for the sake of political correctness and a fear of offending someone who in most cases chooses to live in this country because of those very freedoms. In God I trust. If you choose not to, that is your FREEDOM to do so. Respect and covet that freedom even if you don't respect and worship God.
- 3 votes
Please, please, please...do some research and use your brain! You attribute all ethics and morals to the Judeo-Christian heritage. Are you not aware that many or most of the ethical and moral principles in the Old and New Testaments are older than either of these books? People who were not Jewish or Christians came up with all of these basic moral concepts before the bible was written. Even the ideas of virgin birth and rising from the dead were popular themes for religious figures before, during and after biblical periods.
When you speak from such lack of understanding of history, you are providing more evidence of the very stereotypes you reject for modern day christians. I see no longing for truth, no thirst for knowledge and a total lack of wisdom in most of the statements in favor of keeping religious graffitti on US currency.
You are not making your case.
- 4 votes
It certainly doesn't matter if you believe in the God that these two religions were established to worship.
Actually, it apparently does, believe the motto is "In God We Trust," not "In Morals We Trust."
It has continued the adherence to basic morals that are found in the religious writings of Christianity and Judaism.
The same wonderful basic morals that led to the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and the Salem witch trials. Lovely, those morals are.
What exactly would you base your laws and morality upon. Personal conviction? What would drive that conviction? If you believe in nothing, there is nothing to which you are accountable.
Ah yes, because under God, every Christian believes in precisely the same morality. For example, Episcopalians, Roman Catholics, Mormons, and Westboro Baptists believe in precisely the same morals... right?
Please study real American History and find the proof of what really made this country great.
If you think this motto helped make America great, and then apparently you think "we freakin' hate commies" was fundamental to the founding the US.
- 7 votes
It says something about a religion that implores government to uphold and sustain itself. In fact, Benjamin Franklin once wrote about this:
October 9, 1780
I am fully of your opinion respecting religious tests; but, though the people of Massachusetts have not in their new constitution kept quite clear of them, yet, if we consider what that people were one hundred years ago, we must allow they have gone great lengths in liberality of sentiment on religious subjects; and we may hope for greater degrees of perfection, when their constitution, some years hence, shall be revised. If Christian preachers had continued to teach as Christ and his Apostles did, without salaries, and as the Quakers now do, I imagine tests would never have existed; for I think they were invented, not so much to secure religion itself, as the emoluments of it. When a religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and, when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support it, so that its professors are obliged to call for the help of the civil power, it is a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one. . . .
Benjamin Franklin to Dr. Richard Price
Source of Information:
Excerpt of letter written by Benjamin Franklin to Dr. Richard Price, October 9, 1780. Works of Benjamin Franklin (Sparks ed.), VIII 505-506, in Bigelow ed, VII, 139, 140. Church and State in the United States, Volume I, Anson Phelps Stokes, D.D., LL.D., Harper & Brothers (1950) pp 298)
Solid legal and historical research -with cited sources- may be found here.
- 6 votes
"It has continued the adherence to basic morals that are found in the religious writings of Christianity and Judaism"
Whcih basic morals that are found in the Christian/Judeo writings do you like best?
Incest?
Polygamy?
Rape?
Slavery?
Murder?
Lying?
God endorses ALL of these morals... and this just from Genesis! No misinterpretation. All clear-cut in plain writing. If you haven't cherry-picked the bible to just read what you want (or rather what your preacher wants) to read you may have missed all these morals we should be living by. No problem, let me know and I can give you the verses.
You see, I don't trust in god. He is a jealous and vengeful god. If I trusted him, he'd tell me to kill my son (Still haven't left Genesis for my examples).
You can trust in a childish god who will kill you if you make him mad, but there is no reason to make EVERYONE say they trust him.
Soooo once again, as has been asked by many people here...
Putting "in god we trust" on money and in our pledge forces me to say things contrary to my own beliefs (that there is no god).
Leaving the phrase out of our money and pledge in no way hinders your right to express your belief (that there IS a god).
So if this country values rights and freedom, how is that reflected by keeping god in money and the pledge?
- 5 votes
God does not endorse the items you have listed. In fact many times God punished His people for these very acts. They are in the Bible as a statement of fact of what the people did. God never endorses the above.
For hundreds of years the people did these acts and very little repentance. God took them out ie the Philistines.
Perhaps you should study the bible rather than read the cliff-notes.
- 4 votes
Well, let me see...
God kills EVERYONE (except Lot and his family) in Sodom and Gomorrah... even the children and babies.
So I guess god doesn't endorse even his own actions huh? Merciful god my butt.
Well, Lot and his family were spared since (in god's eyes) they were the lone righteous people there. So let's look to them to see what god sees as righteous behavior shall we?
An angry mob of young and old men come to Lot's house wanting the angels that were there. To appease the mob, Lot offers up his two daughters to do with what they please.
Wow! What a great dad. So wilfully allowing your daughters to be raped by a mob of men is perfectly ok... after all, god STILL considered Lot to be a righteous man after this and saved him for the fire and brimstone.
After god kills everyone else, now to include Lot's wife, the remaining three people are who god considers righteous... Lot and his two daughters. So Lot's daughters get their dad drunk and have sex him and have his kids (This didn't even happen in Kentucky).
So god endorses killing (he did it himself) in GEN 19:24
god endorses rape (or at least suggesting rape) because after Lot hands his daughters over to the mob (GEN 19:8), god still sees him as righteous.
Then Lot fathers his own daughter's children... GEN 19:30-38
LOT IS THE MAN god ENDORSES AS BEING JUST AND RIGHTEOUS!!! (so add incest to list)
(as a side note, I don't care HOW drunk I was... I don't think I could possibly have sex with my own daughter... let alone two of them on consecutive nights)
Since GEN 19:14 says that Lot's daughters were both married... you would have to assume they weren't still virgins right? But when lot tries to get the mob to rape his daughters, he tells them that his daughters ARE virgins (you know... since biblical guys like the virgin girls so much). Once again, as being "just" and "righteous", he was spared after all this... so in god's eyes, this is behavior he implicitly endorses.
There... without putting a whole lot of thought into this, just ONE bible story in Genesis shows god endorsing:
Killing
Rape
Incest
Lying
So don't go telling me that we need to have that pervert's (god's) name on our money and in our pledge to remind us of the values we should be following.
- 5 votes
I am so sorry you do not trust in the Living God. I will be praying for you because I do not want you to go to hell when you die. About your Genesis account. Yes, Lot did offer his daughters, because he panicked about what might happen to the Lord's angels. But the angels took care of the situation before Lot could act on his ill-gotten plan. Secondly Lot did not lie about his daughters being virgins. They were engaged but had not slept with their husbands to be. But back in those times they were already considered sons-in-law. And, yes, the daughters did sin by getting their father drunk and sleeping with him. But just because a sin is committed, that certainly doesn't mean that God condones what we do. God has given us free will and that is why we mess up so much and we need Jesus, who bore all our sins on the cross so that we could be reconciled with the Father and have eternal life. God loves YOU! Even if you were the only person on earth, God would have sent Jesus to die on the cross for you! It is an awesome gift. And for those who don't believe in heaven or hell. Let me just say, if I live my life believing in God, and die to find there is nothing after. ... OH WELL!
If you live your life not believing and find out your wrong.... OH HELL!
I know God is real. I see it in His creation. I see it in the Bible. I see it in my life. I see miracles all the time. I hear Him talk to me. I see Him answer prayers. I see Him bless me.
I SEE HIM!
- 1 vote
Well I'm very happy for you. Since you see him every day, you shouldn't need to see the pervert's name on our money. You can go to church and listen to the pedophile child-molesting priest tell you all about your god. You can have bible studies in your living room where you justify the screwed up things in the bible by making excuses. You can have all your religious beliefs and practice your faith all you want without plastering YOUR beliefs on OUR money. Only seems fair to me. So keeping to the point of this message board... what's your problem with going back to NOT printing your beliefs on OUR money?
- 2 votes
Okay so you took scripture from the Bible that was before Jesus came to teach what was right, so yes in the old testament there was all kinds of evil spoken about. Another thing if God had not forgiven then how could he forgive now? The Evil things done in those times were much more about the devil trying to be in control and Did God not destroy the community that Lot was living in??? He gave Lot a choice take your family and choose me and what is right or die. God was not telling Lot those things were okay but because we have free will he was allowed to choose his path and when he was told enough God did exactly what he said he would, Lot just had to be forgiven as we all do and change his ways. As far as Lot goes with being with his daughters how do you think we are here today God only created one man and one woman how are we now many nations??? HM... this was not wrong in God's eyes he made man and woman to procreate we are taught that this is bad because of the problems science has shown it can cause. As Far as the rest it is wrong. Although I am not saying I believe in incest I am only stating the way you have to believe to have true faith and that I do believe.
Jesus you guys are so hard headed. Do you honestly think all the god-endorsed religion happened in the old testament? Learn to freakin' read! I just took crap out of Genesis 'cause it was the first book. The MOST violent and sick books come later, but I'm not gonna go into it all cause it's a waste of my time. You obviously are to stupid to read for yourself or think for yourself.
Still didn't answer the question though.
You can have all your religious beliefs and practice your faith all you want without plastering YOUR beliefs on OUR money. Only seems fair to me. So keeping to the point of this message board... what's your problem with going back to NOT printing your beliefs on OUR money?
- 6 votes
You have to be the most UN patriotic American I have ever come across, you have no right to use that as your screen name. We will pray for you. YOU NEED IT!!!!!!!!1111
- 2 votes
so What are you atheist??? If so then why is God always the center of atheistic discussion??? Why can't you just deal with the fact that although you choose to have a fatal outcome that other people can have faith and hope in something positive such as God and going to Heaven. What would a world without God in it be like??? I can tell you, it would be full of crime and destruction because the morals of God and the Bible cause us to have some positive in this self destructing society. I have seen and experienced many miracles through my belief in God and Jesus. Belief doesn't come from a book it comes from spiritual experiences you should try and just imagine the things God can do for you. You can be as down and out as possible and he can raise you up higher than you have ever dreamed. He can take you from feeling empty and alone and make you feel full and loved when no else is anywhere to be found. If you open your mind, heart and soul just as small as a mustard seed he will speak to you. You don't need a Bible to know and experience him, it is merely a tool to teach. The true Relationship is spiritual. I will pray that God can touch your heart to open up just enough to send a chill through your spine as you read about his works in others lives. Praise the Lord God almighty!
- 2 votes
terrilcorn,
You have to be the most UN patriotic American I have ever come across, you have no right to use that as your screen name
I have been to multiple battlefields. I have been shot at with rifles, rockets, missiles, and RPGs. I've continued to serve our country after two of my friends have died doing so.
I've missed countless anniversaries, children's birthdays, holidays, etc. so that I could do what must be done for our country. Time and again I have put duty to our country above my family. I've struggled with these decisions, constantly asking myself if I'm doing what's best for my wife and children. I want to cry every time I yank my children out of school and pull them away from their friends so we can move to a new duty station. Yet, when it is time to leave the Army I sign up for another tour. I just can't fathom that selling used cars or insurance will give me the same satisfaction as serving our country. Even with all the hardships, my devotion to nation trumps.
None of this matters though. I am the most UN patriotic person you have ever come across. Why? Because I don't believe in your god? I didn't reply to your post for two weeks. I didn't plan to. Your words kept eating away at me though so I decided to write back anyway.
I don't serve our country so that I can have your respect. I don't stay in the Army so I can say "Look at me! Look how patriotic I am!" I simply look at service as a necessary part of our nation's success and continued prominence. I love the people with whom I serve. I receive unparalleled satisfaction from knowing that what I do helps our country.
I receive regular job offers willing to pay 4X my military salary. I don't leave the service.
So while this may sound like me tooting my own horn... it is not. I was just too angry at your comments to let it go any longer.
Go ahead and hate me because I don't believe in your god... but NEVER question my patriotism!
- 3 votes
After reading many of your comments I am saddened. You seem to be very angry person. My son is in the army and I hope he never has to serve with you, and if he should have to serve with anyone like you that his belief in God will get him through it. Any unit needs to be close and tight knit to do a good juob in a combat or any other situation. You need to know they are there and have your back, and they need to know you would do the same for them. If you have no beliefs what do you really have, nothing! Whatever religion a person is doesn't really matter, we are blessed to have that freedom because of our founding fathers, whether you agree or disagree. best of luck to you
Matthew, I'm disturbed by your comment "I am a believer in God etc, and I like the thought of us being a Godly nation. Its time the majority stands up in this country and does something instead of our leadership giving in to EVERY vocal minority in this country. That is just great lets do what the small group wants and forget about of the majority, what about our rights?
Certainly the interests of the majority are important in a democracy, but that doesn't mean that the minority should be ignored altogether. One of the purposes of the Bill of Rights is to protect individuals from the "tyranny of the majority."
- 2 votes
Thanks, , for pointing out that not all morals stem from monotheistic belief. Southernbelle, hard as it may be for you to believe, I lead a moral life, constantly examining the effects of my actions on those around me and adjusting my behavior accordingly, without the guidance of any deity or higher power. (Or at least without believing in such guidance; I suppose there are those believers who would say my non-belief is simply a figment of my imagination and despite what I want to believe, there's someone looking down on me helping me to be a good person. But this is not a discussion about whether God exists!)
Things are just getting out of hand. We all have to stick together. If you are not happy with the way AMERICANS do things then GET OUT. "In God We Trust" should remain always on our money and UNDER GOD in the pledge should always remain and ENGLISH is the language in AMERICA if you can't speak it then learn or GET OUT. AMERICANS are starting to become the minority(?) in our own country. How sad is that. We need to put our foot down now and stand together and not let this country get any worse. It seemed after 911 we were all doing our part to stand by each other and not take any crap, but time has passed and we are falling apart. Don't let this happen. We need to stand together forever if we want AMERICA to be the best country. We are letting too many people in that just don't belong.
- 5 votes
"In God We Trust" should remain always on our money and UNDER GOD in the pledge should always remain
The Founding Fathers didn't think so, but Joseph McCarthy did. Ah yes, model American that man was.
ENGLISH is the language in AMERICA if you can't speak it then learn or GET OUT.
And no one's asking for a Spanish motto on our money.
- 9 votes
thank "god" for a voice of reason in amongst the fanatical slightly militant comments I have been reading on this discussion ... kudos to you ... oh ... is "kudos" English in origin?? I don't know my family came from Russia, Poland, Lithuania, and Check. ... guess i am no good because my family didn't speak English when they arrived ... lol
- 1 vote
Jack, Jack, Jack...
While Mcarthy may have gone too far, Communism was a real threat to the free world. He did arrest several spies in this country. Rosenbergs ring a bell?
You don't seem to happy with religious people. Are you scared to have a discussion about the truths of religion or do you like to just dismiss any point of view with historical facts other than your own skewed view of the world?
Earlier you mentioned the Crusades, Spanish Inquisition, etc. How about Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung, Communist Russia, and finally the over 37 million aborted babies. Where was the religious in any of these atrocities? Oh that's right, they were all secularists and atheiests. The number of people who died from religious wars/crusades is far, far less than those who have died in the name of secular humanism. Even if you exclude the abortions.
- 4 votes
Sorry, Blue collar, but even the Catholic church admits that more people were killed in the crusades, in the name of religion, than in all the wars since, combined.
- 2 votes
KidsMom, It is really tough here in America. You're right about that. It's like you can't be an American in your own country. You know, that's been a problem for a long time. I think the American Indians had that very problem.
Thing is, it's technically not "your" country. It's the country of Native Americans. So when they tell you to GTFO, you should consider GTFO to England or somewhere else.
Adventist...what is the source the church said more were killed in the Crusades...and what is your church's stand and perception on other churches...I mean, I have seen tracts of the churches started since 1820 or so and they all share the same info and perceptions...and it is different....if you know what I mean...the greatest numbers of deaths in the history of mankind are attributed to secular states.
Boy, thus far, it seems that every time I see the word "Mom" in someone's posting name, I can pretty much rely on that post spouting, in the name of Christianity!, very un-Christian, hateful words of condemnation for people and thoughts opposing their own. That's scary - what kind of values of hatred and lack of acceptance are you teaching your children? It's giving "Moms" a bad name here. Perhaps I should've used "Mom" in my post-name just to balance it out.
It is obvious, and I suppose inevitable, that this topic has morphed, and caused tangent discussions. I am certainly learning a lot of history by reading this thread - as, I'm sure, a bunch of mis-information, which I will just have to confirm later on my own. But I think a lot of the divergence has to do with people missing each others' points.
Having "In God we Trust" on our money certainly supports and acknowledges my religious views, but I can see how someone who believes in another "guide" or named god (such as Allah or Buddha), or someone who believes in no god, could find that exclusive of them - i.e. not represented by the "we" in that statement. In other words, if somehow, a non-Christian were to ever be elected to the White House, how comfortable would I be if he/she "suggested" that a statement confirming his/her other religion be printed on the money (as McCarthy did only about 50 years ago)? Not very. So to avoid all that, nothing of the sort should be represented on our nation's currency. (By the way, for all the conservationists out there, they're constantly printing up new money, so a different design can very easily be incorporated into the new - just as was done a few years ago with the new bills and coins.)
The separation of church and state is so very important. We don't want the government telling us what, when, how and to whom we can or should worship. Just as it could be very dangerous if particular religious groups told the government how to run certain things and make policies based on the teachings of their religion. I won't presume to know what the founding fathers meant for this country, but my interpretation of what they wrote and fought for is this: a (new) country where people could come and live freely without persecution for being different or thinking or worshiping differently - offering protection to those who would abide by the laws and participate in a moral code set forth, ensuring that no others would be hurt by their actions and way of life. So I ask - all of you who call for the exclusion and exportation of immigrants, from what year would you start your "immigrant" search? 2002 or 1492?
So, in following the separation of church and state (whether it's written in an "official, original document" or not), if it is a governmental body which determines the designs to be printed on our money , regardless of which private "printing press" they use (the FRB), then religious denomination should be stricken from the design. However, in the case of religion being taught in public schools, I believe there is a responsibility to teach it (in middle school), and not just Christianity, but all "major" religions and "minor" ones. For religion is such a huge part of our world and ultimately, personal lives and choices, that having a good, basic understanding of all of them is important.
As for the moral accusations that have been hurled back and forth by both sides throughout this thread, I do not consider myself above anyone else because I have faith in a particular being and savior. It is what I believe - it is what brings me comfort - it is what guides me. But I do not discount the fact that others without that faith in a higher being, can also live their lives and act according to a good moral code that they've set for themselves. Their morals may fall in line with those of Christianity, but I'm not going to claim it for ours and ours, alone. They put their accountability in their own hands, or the hands of others. (There are good and bad apples in all barrels.) And I'm not going to wish anyone misfortune in order for them to "have to find God and be saved," as one of the other, sad to say, fellow "Christians" eluded to, just because they seemingly found God that way. As far as I'm concerned, religion should adopt the "don't ask, don't tell" policy (especially in politics). Although, look at how many problems that has already caused for another group...
I believe that it is not whom we choose to exclude but who we include that brings us closer to the teachings of Jesus. If we are so desperate to find an alternative saying for "In God we trust." to remind us ALL of our convictions, how about "All we need is Love." (Government can capitalize or lower-case "love" as it sees fit.)
As I said on another board. Since I don't want my government interfering with my religion, my religion should be kind enough not to interfere with my government.
Try it... you'll find life easier when you're not all mixed up. 'The Pledge' was written by a minister and a man of deep faith but he did not see that it was fit or meet to include 'God' in the pledge
The Original Form:
I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
- 1 vote
We are in deep trouble when we let the Atheist tell us how to run our country. This country was found on Christianity and until we return to what this county was found on we will continue to have trouble. When the Government took the prayer out of school look at what has happen. We have to have armed guard at our schools, we have school shootings. Some of this young generation does not have repect for themself and no one else, must less their parents. The government has taken over parents raising their children. I for one think taking "In God we Trust" of our money is one of the stupidities thing this country has every done. Instead of spending fund, that we do not have, on changing our money use if for passages for all the people that live in the United States to go where they would be happier. All I can say is one day these Atheist will be sorry when there life here on this earth is over. I bet the Atheist have no trouble spending our money that has "In God we Trust" on it. If they have go to a country that does not have it and does not have the freedom that we enjoy here. If we keep letting these type of people tell us what to do then we will lose our freedom. I know the Bible tells us these type of things that are happen now will happen near the end of time but at least I know that I love God and am a Christian.
- 9 votes
Enough already with the atheistic rulings we complacent Christians have repeatedly allowed in our country, and more importantly, God's country. Where were God's people when ONE woman succeeded in her bid to remove prayer from God's schools????? If we want to stop the atheists' governing America, then let's get off our religious behinds and take action! We, as citizens of the U.S., are entitled to have our desires heard and complied with without being overruled by a few "politically correct" politicians or so-called governmental officials. Our wishes do count and it's high time we're heard! Contact your senator, start a petition, place your vote on this website -- just do something instead of give these important, Godly matters lip service! Let's stand up for God and keep this His country!
- 13 votes
"This country was found on Christianity and until we return to what this county was found on we will continue to have trouble"
our / your founding fathers had no intention of women voting... are you saying we should resort back to that too ?
- 3 votes
"our / your founding fathers had no intention of women voting... are you saying we should resort back to that too ?"
Back in the 1700's almost no one in other countries especially Women were not allowed to vote. And in the countries that could vote, the people that voted were all men. So the US was founded on similar principles to other nations on that point which is really irrelevant to an issue like God.
But a lot of countries did not believe in God. So we obviously purposely went against the tread or the groove and stood up for what we believe. And put it on our money and in our Pledge of Allegiance!!! We were founded as a Christian nation [that did not make you believe what we believed, {but for the most part if you really know your History most Americans in the 1700's that were founding fathers were Christians}] if you like it or not and we should remain that way!
If you want proof explain to me why Moses' face is the only face looking right over the floor of congress? Why the Declaration of Independence says "Creator"? Why Benjamin Franklin [one of the most liberal of all the founding fathers] decided to lead congress in prayer because he knew nothing could be accomplished without God? Why the Pledge of Allegiance and every piece of money says "In God We Trust? Why did the settlers flee Europe because of religious persecution if they weren't Christians?
- 1 vote
The people who came to America wanted the freedom to not be told what religion they should practice, not to be told they could not practice religion, that was the main reason they left their countries. Mose of our buildings have some kind of symbol that has a reference to God on the top of them. That was another way for God to always see them praising Him. It wasn't founded so that those who did not believe in God could tell us not to believe it was just the opposite because in some countries in Europe they would not allow people to choose a different religion. In America we can honor God as a Jew, Muslim, Catholic/Christain, Buddhist etc. But we do honor God. At this time in America the majority of the people living here want to keep "In God we Trust" on our money. Just as in an election, the one who gets the most votes becomes our next President/Senator etc. so "In God We Trust" remain on our money. If not then we are taking the first steps to becoming a dictatorship and the next time the people are not satisfied with the outcome of the election, they will start marching in the streets and killing everyone who does not want the loser to become President/Senator, etc. In a Democracy the majority rules, are we still a Democracy or have we become a country run by dictatorships.
If we can't trust in GOD, then who the heck are we supposed to believe in and trust? Surely not the government because striking GOD from practically all things in this world has already caused us a free ride to HELL!!
Thanks a lot Commander in Chief!!!
Hopefully the almighty GOD has a seat, right next to Saddam, for all of those who are for erasing "In GOD We Trust"!!
- 7 votes
Dan, your avoiding the question.... Try stay focused!
"The Five Monkeys"
Start with a cage containing five monkeys.
In the cage, hang a banana on a string and put a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the monkeys with cold water. After awhile, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result - all the monkeys are sprayed with cold water. Pretty soon, if another monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.
Now, turn off the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his horror, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he will be assaulted.
Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm. Again, replace a third original monkey with a new one. The new one makes it to the stairs and is attacked as well. Two of the four monkeys that beat him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs, or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey. After replacing the fourth and fifth original monkeys, all the monkeys that have been sprayed with cold water have been replaced. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs.
Why not? Because that is the way it has always been.
- 1 vote
It never fails, someone always brings up the "prayer in schools" issue. No one seems to understand.
The supreme court DID NOT ban prayer in schools nor take prayer out of the schools. Look at the origins. When the colonies were formed in this country, Baptists settled here, Methodists there, etc. and so on. In each community, the schools were typically run by the churches, so each community learned in school consistent with the predominant religion of the community.
As the nation grew, and we had public schools, more integration in the communities regarding religious beliefs (or not), each community no longer had one predominant religion, it was only a matter of time that the supreme court would finally rule that the schools (read government) cannot dictate a specific religion.
That is all the court did, is to say that the school cannot lead or control the religious beliefs since there was no longer a common ground. It has even been upheld in the supreme court, that anyone with religious convictions can include their beliefs in discussions, classwork, assignments, etc. as long as they are not proselytizing.
Any school that has extracurricular activity groups (chess club, math club, etc.) must also allow religious or bible groups as well, if there is interest in such a group.
It is only the narrow minded and the atheists that interpret this to mean anything religious was banned from schools. The bottom line is this. It is a parent's responsibility to establish religious foundations, the child's responsibility to accept or reject, and if there is no prayer in schools, it is because the children no longer take it there.
But how many students still say, "Oh God, I hope I passed that test!"
If you want prayer in schools, teach your children to pray.
If you want the school to teach your children religion, there are still plenty of church schools to pick from.
- 4 votes
Kimberly,
Do you really believe that all those who do not believe in YOUR god are as bad as Saddam? You need to grow up. There are many good people in this world that do not believe as you do.
Are you also saying that removing a word "god" from anything takes god out of your life? And others? Removing it only shows that this society welcomes choice of religion. It doesn't tell anyone they cannot still believe in or worship their god. So saying that that removing god from everything else in the world has caused us a free ride to hell is utterly ridiculous.
For those who choose to live their life by their god's rules, taking it out of wording wont' change anything for them. They will still believe in their god.
Just like taking Christian prayer out of our public schools is not responsible for our decline in our schools. Those families that sent their children to school and welcomed prayer there, they are still teaching the prayer at home. Those kids are still getting their parent's message, although now nobody is forced to say someone else's prayers in school. I sure don't want my children being forced to say a prayer to a god we don't believe to be real. I don't want mixed messages given to my children. I also don't expect the school to force my religious beliefs down any child's throat. Prayer should be kept in the homes and churches. Not in school where there are too many different faiths to accommodate.
- 5 votes
"And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly." (Mat. 6:5-6)
I believe in God, I am not telling anyone who dont believe to start believe. I dont critisize any religion, and I dont blame God for crime commited by humans. Powerful people, rich, politicians are using Bible and in name of GOD are comminting crime. Politicians are using Bible , in the name of GOD to provoke conflicts between US, to have control over US. Now We have another example what is going in Congress now. Just live OUR believes, and GOD alone. Stop beying a such hipocrites, and pretending that they are doind this for CONSTITUTION, because Those in power are the ONE who are obusing Constitution in first place. They are obeying Constitution, and using Bible to gain all possible. Power,control,crime,corruption.lies,wars, and much more. We are the ONE who must respect Constitution, they will go around in any way possible, now using Constitution to take OUR Faith from OUR lifes!!!. Faith is so strong, that they will fight as long as possible to kill it in US!!! How many millions of people die for their faith, and who was killing them, and still does, all those selfish,power hungry ugly people. So, stop fighting with each other, respect people beliefs and let US live in peace and love, because this is what Faith is teaching US; love, respect,honesty, giving and peace
- 7 votes
Tell the Atheist to move to a country founded on his beliefs if he does not like the USA.
- 5 votes
Bil, Your comment is sad. Our country can accomodate Atheists without a problem. No worthy belief system is at risk from a competing one here. Your's has s spine; do not fear others. You words make you sound weak unnecessarily.
- 4 votes
tell this atheist to go to China or any other country that tries to wipe outreligious freedom
if he wants but our country was born on Christian beliefs and our original government was established with Christian doctrine. I would love to hear him grovel if he lived in country that demands a certain religion. He can go to H--if he wants b
- 3 votes
Disappointment isn't strong enough to explain how I feel about removing history, pride, respect and love from our US currency. In God We Trust goes deeper than words. Why was the phrase placed there? What did it mean back then? Why is God saluted in some many of our US doctrine? I will argue that faith built this nation. It's evident in some many inscriptions and monuments. If for nothing more, allow we the people that cherish this past, the opportunity to salute it with this some memento "In God We Trust"
- 2 votes
If you are a true Christian you would love the atheist. As a Christian, I have no problem with having atheist in the country and having them exercise their right to free speech, just as I have a right to mine, including expressing my religion. Since when can we not tolerate each other. If as Christian we believe that our values are being lost, we need to do a better job protecting them. We cannot just demonize others and put our heads in the sand. I would say not only accept the atheist, embrace them, maybe you will be a Christian that is more Christ like.
Thanks, Joe...as an atheist, I appreciate your accepting philosophy. I wish more Christians felt this way about open exchange of ideas, instead of being threatened by other beliefs (or lack of belief). I understand the desire to worship your God in all the ways you can, but I don't understand getting upset when others don't want to worship your God in all those ways! To me, invoking "In God WE Trust" on secular currency is a way of asking everyone who uses the currency to subscribe to a belief in God.
- 1 vote
Let's see, The US Constitution states in the first Amendment...""CONGRESS" SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.."
Since "CONGRESS" has never passed such a law, The US Supreme Court Could not, by law, hear a law suit claiming it had. (#1 violation of the Rule of the Court)
Since the Supreme Court published It's ruling, establishing a new law they called "The separation of Church and State,) The Court violated the law by "CREATING" law. That is the sole and separate function of the legislature. (2) Violation of Federal Constitutional Law.. (Separation of Powers Act.)
Finally the Insult of insults, by creating this new law, the Court violated the Constitution by "CHANGING and MODIFYING" our Constitution without the Radification process of the States.
Because of these violations, the entiry sitting Court needs to be impeached and this alledged law stricken from the records.
I am not a christian. I am not religious in any way, but I am a patriot and I believe that traditions should be held so we remember how we started out to becoming the greatest country in the world. I we lose sight of this by stripping away all the reminders of our past, then we will lose our unity as a whole. Our society is already in danger of being destroyed by the liberals who have their hands out for all they can get from the hardworking taxpayers. Soon there will be more people receiving aid than there are paying in. If we do not clamp down on "pork" spending by our electors and handouts to illegals and others who are living off the government teet, we are destined to fall into ruin, like so many other "civilized" societies in history. Its a real threat and more important than worrying about some words on our money.
- 6 votes
I believe that traditions should be held so we remember how we started out to becoming the greatest country in the world.
By staging commie witch hunts?
I we lose sight of this by stripping away all the reminders of our past, then we will lose our unity as a whole.
"In God We Trust" was created during the Red Scare. Yes, let's constantly remind ourselves of that every time we're at the register.
- 6 votes
"In God We Trust" was created during the Red Scare. Yes, let's constantly remind ourselves of that every time we're at the register.
Actually.... April 22, 1864
I with you on this!!! To many things are trying to be changed with our goverment..WHY??!! Because we are allowing people all over the world to live freely in this great country..I have done three tours overseas, for what?? so people from the nation that we are fighting can have a say in what has been written on our currency for years be changed... I dont think so. I say if you dont like what goes on in this great nation, get the hell out!!! go back to your own country!!!!!!!!!!!
- 4 votes
Lisa-422274
Yes Lisa! You are wise. The motto is a defining characteristic of western civilization, as is the phrase found in the Declaration of Independance Endowed by our Creator with inalienable rights etc...
Thanks :^)
What is our country coming to!?? HELLO!!! HELLO!!! HELLO!!!!???
God help America not to harden it's heart and believe only in ourselves!
This country was built on Christian principles, by Christian founders fervent in the belief that Love should reign above all else. In our creative endeavors and flawed nature, we don't always get things right -- but there is nothing wrong with the structure (the thoughts, principles and practices in the Bible) and holding onto the belief that one day LOVE WILL RULE THE WORLD!
God is Love, Truth & Light. To deny this is to consciously empower the opposite: hate, lies and darkness. Taking God out of the picture right now, especially in light of what is happening in the world, would be a devastating error in judgement. So if not God, what should we focus our hearts and minds on to recalibrate them when the craziness of the world seeps in?
What's next - our pledge of allegiance. "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under Atheism, separated from God,..." Just look to Russia or China to see how much liberty and justice you get in a separated state.
You know what the problem is?! The problem is that Atheism needs to be officially declared a religion. Going against God is a spiritual practice and a personal choice and it's about time it was recognized as such.
Take God off our currency??!! -- Why, to get Him out of our minds and hearts? ...WHAT PURPOSE DOES THIS SERVE!? Who does this serve?! It certainly does not serve me the people!
Why is our government spending my tax dollars on such an insane, time consuming, costly and pointless mission!? What brainiac woke up one morning and said to his wife "I think we should take 'in God we Trust' of our currency." What other visionary thought this was a good idea!?
WHY ARE WE EVEN HAVING TO SPEND TIME AND ENERGY ON THIS!
- 3 votes
Obviously a different moron than the one that decided to put it on there in the first place.
- 5 votes
"WHY ARE WE EVEN HAVING TO SPEND TIME AND ENERGY ON THIS! "
Because some brainiac woke up, looked at his wife and said "I think we should put 'In God We Trust' on our money".
- 8 votes
God is Love, Truth & Light. To deny this is to consciously empower the opposite: hate, lies and darkness.
Yep, the Spanish Inquisition was totally about Love, Truth & Light: Love of the rack, Truth of the Tribunal, and Light of the burning stake.
So if not God, what should we focus our hearts and minds on to recalibrate them when the craziness of the world seeps in?
I find it quite disturbing that you need to recalibrate your mind to reality every once in a while.
It certainly does not serve me the people!
Wow, I didn't know 300 million people collaboratively wrote that comment. That's quite impressive.
- 7 votes
Ignorance indeed.
You have a lot of time on your hands, don't you? Why don't spend that reading a book on rhetoric or history. All I read on this commentary is a lot of ad hominem - which may persuade the weak minded, but holds as much water as a block of potassium.
Do you site anything? Have you any background for any of your comments? I have seen precious few. Tell me, Mr. Huang, how many poor innocents do you suppose suffered at the hands of the Spanish Inquisition and why do you think that those poor, horribly, unjustly treated souls were the victims of all of Christendom? Do you think the God of the Bible loved what happened at the Inquisition? Have you any idea what He does like or doesn't? No, we aren't proud of what happened, but if you think that is the cream of Christianity, you are really out to lunch.
I would love to see you without recalibration... Every night while you dream of the glory of belittling another person you have never met on a digital debate forum that wouldn't last two minutes in any respectable high school, your brain "re-calibrates" itself in REM sleep. I find it quite disturbing that you don't wish to "recalibrate" yourself. Lets call recalibration by its proper term, inner reflection. I can see you have no interest in truly doing that. And in this country, you are free not to.
Ignorance does not bother me, as it denotes something not yet learned. Your arrogance and belligerence on the other hand seem to be completely self willed. I pray you are simply misinformed, but I doubt it.
- 1 vote
It's hard to believe that I've really read through this far and not seen the quote from the Treaty of Tripoly, Art. 11, drafted near the end of Washington's second term and proclaimed and signed UNANIMOUSLY by the Senate (some of which were the founding fathers) in 1797 during Adams presidency , "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"
- 3 votes
PATRICK HENRY:
"Orator of the Revolution." • This is all the inheritance I can give my dear family. The religion of Christ can give them one which will make them rich indeed." —The Last Will and Testament of Patrick Henry
"It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here." [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
JOHN HANCOCK &JOHN ADAMS: We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]
JOHN ADAMS: " The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." • "[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty." –John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress
SAMUEL ADAMS: | Portrait of Sam Adams | " He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all." [ "American Independence," August 1, 1776. Speech delivered at the State House in Philadelphia] " Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity… and leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christian system." [October 4, 1790]
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS:
• "Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?" "Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity"?
--1837, at the age of 69, when he delivered a Fourth of July speech at Newburyport, Massachusetts.
CHARLES CARROLL - signer of the Declaration of Independence | Portrait of Charles Carroll
" Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure...are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments." [Source: To James McHenry on November 4, 1800.]
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: | Portrait of Ben Franklin " God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel" –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern." In 1787 when Franklin helped found Benjamin Franklin University, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning, built on Christ, the Cornerstone."
ALEXANDER HAMILTON: • Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:
(1) Christianity
(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity. "The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States." On July 12, 1804 at his death, Hamilton said, "I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me." "For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." [1787 after the Constitutional Convention] "I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man."
GEORGE WASHINGTON: "What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ." [speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779] "To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian" [May 2, 1778, at Valley Forge]
THOMAS JEFFERSON:
" The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man." "Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus." "I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever." (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]
- 4 votes
The Spanish Inquisition was about the concern of sacrileges of that held sacred by the Catholic Church...there have been many inflated numbers...only recently the documents were finally opened, and it was the work primarily of lay people, events previously exaggerated...this does not excuse any abuse or injustice either...you have to look at a culture and its times and its history...Spain was overrun by marauding and plundering Moors for 700 years...so let people come in to plunder and go have a Siesta?
I mean, it looks like everybody and everything has the right to protect what is dear to them, but if it is of a Christian source, then if it defends itself, only Christianity is evil...
Kiwi-422276
What's next - our pledge of allegiance. "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under Atheism, separated from God,..."
The Original Form:
I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
http://oldtimeislands.org/pledge/pledge.htm
Considering that is the original form of The Pledge of Allegiance, which I say every single day at my job in a public school, I don't see a problem. It doesn't conflict with my religious belief which isn't Christian. I do not say the 'under god' part because I don't believe in the judeo/christian/islamic idea of god, but rather have a Lady and her consort.
I am no less loyal to my country, and I am no less religious or moral than you. In fact, more so because I do not resort to histrionics, name calling, abuse of caps, or any other form of hysterics to get my point across
From Wiki:
Official versions (changes in bold italics)
1892
“I pledge allegiance to my flag and the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”
1892 to 1923
"I pledge allegiance to my flag and to the republic that he represents: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
1923 to 1924
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States and to the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
1924 to 1954
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands; one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
1954 to Present
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands: one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
And guess what? I stand, place my hand over my heart and recite the pledge, then I stay standing and silent for the national anthem... yep how unpatriotic, immoral, and faithless I am ::rolls eyes:: I have more faith in my government to at least try to do it job that someone who insists that I have force my government to conform to my religious ideals!
- 2 votes
sure take it! we've taken God out of our schools, hows that worked out so far? We are taking it out of our society how is that working out for us?
Wasn't religion one of our main reasons for starting this country?
Let's go back to the real meaning of "separation of church and state" it was intended to keep the state from telling the church what to teach. Not to strip all religion and moral conduct from our society.
What's so wrong in believing in a higher power that we will answer too. I have yet to see an evolutionist ever tell me where the matter, or spark, or mucus, or whatever came from! Now they are saying "well it was transported form an alien from outer space" well where did the alien come from.
Im not a super religious bible thumper, I think they do as much harm as good. I am a believer in God etc, and I like the thought of us being a Godly nation. Its time the majority stands up in this country and does something instead of our leadership giving in to EVERY vocal minority in this country. That is just great lets do what the small group wants and forget about of the majority, what about our rights?
Psalm 33:12 Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!
We have been blessed as a nation but Im seeing that begin to change as we pull away!!!!!!!!!
- 7 votes
I too believe this Country was founded on Christian principals. I grew up in a time where prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance was the first duty of our school day. We developed a self-respect and from that respect we developed a respect for our parents, our school, and our Country. We as a country have been Blessed.
Let us, as a positive force, focus on the positive of life, family, faith, and Country rather than nit-pik what words are on our coins and dollars. And for those who are in the minority, to paraphrase another, from a separate comment: quit your whining!
Psalms 33:21 For our heart shall rejoice in him, because we have trusted in his holy name.
- 5 votes
Amen and amen, Matt!!!
Good stuff! Folks should look at the crime, drug and teenage preganancy statitistics, since God was taken out of our schools. Let the facts speak for themselves!
- 5 votes
Well, I don't see how you can equate "moral" behavior with "religious" behavior. Evidently you think wars are moral behavior. Good luck with that thinking.
- 6 votes
"I too believe this Country was founded on Christian principals."
This country was more than founded on Christian principles. OUr constitution was put together with the assumption that it could only work for a moral people who drew their morals from the Christian faith. It is important to note from the following quotes that when the early leaders of our country used the word "religion," it meant Christianity in general, as opposed to any particular sect or denomination. This is not to say that the irreligious or none Christian was not protected by the constitution. It does mean that the Founding Fathers could not conceive of the government succeeding as drafted by people not holding to the morals found in Christianity. That is also not to say that they got everything right - such as, slavery, women's rights, etc.
As for the question of the importance of keeping the phrase "In God We Trust" on currency, removing it is one step closer to pushing God out of the way. Be certain to read the Solzhenitsyn quotes at the end.
Gouverneur Morris
(1752-1816), American federalist leader, one of the formulators of the U.S. Constitution.
“Religion is the only solid basis of good morals: therefore education should teach the precepts of religion, and the duties of man towards God.”
Morris, Gouverneur (1832). Cited in Jared Sparks, The life of Gouverneur Morris. Boston, MA: Gray and Bowen, Vol. III, p.
Samuel Adams
“Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age, by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, of inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity...in short of leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christina system.”
Samuel Adams, “Letter of Samuel Adams to John Adams, October 4, 1790,” in The Writings of Samuel Adams, ed. Harry A. Cushing (New York: Octagon Books, Inc., 1968), 4:343.
Benjamin Rush
“In contemplating the political institution of the United States, I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes, and take so little pains to prevent them. We profess to be republicans and yet, we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government. That is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by the means of the Bible.”
Benjamin Rush, “A Defense of the Use of the Bible as a School Book”, 1798
Benjamin Rush, Essays, Literary, Moral & Philosophical (Philadelphia: Thomas and Samuel F. Bradford, 1798), 112. Online Source:
Article II
I. Religion, morality, and
Article III.
Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever by encouraged. July 13, 1787
F.N. Thorpe, ed., Federal and State Constitutions (Washington: GPO, 1909), 2: 957.
Online Source:
Noah Webster
“In my view, the Christian Religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government, ought to be instructed...no truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian Religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.”
Webster, Noah (1953). Cited in Harry A. Warfel (Ed.), Letters. To David McClure, October 25, 1836. New York: NY: Library Publishers. pp. 453-454.
George Washington
Farewell Address, Sept 17, 1796
“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports...In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens...”
The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.
Online Source:
John Adams
“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand.”
Letter of June 21, 1776, quoted in The Wall Builder Report, Summer 1993
John Adams, “Letter to Zabdiel Adams, Philadelphia, 21 June 1776,” in The Works of John Adams – Second President of the United States, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1854), 9:401. Online Source:
Benjamin Rush
“The only foundation for...a republic is to be laid in Religion. Without this there can be no
virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments.”
Benjamin Rush, Essays, Literary, Moral & Philosophical (Philadelphia: Thomas and Samuel F. Bradford, 1798), 8. Online Source:
George Washington
Farewell Address, Sept 17, 1796
“…And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion... reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”
The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), 38.
Online Source:
Benjamin Rush
“The only foundation for...a republic is to be laid in Religion.” “…Christianity is the only true and perfect religion; and that in proportion as mankind adopt its principles and obey its precepts they will be wise and happy.”
Benjamin Rush, “A Defense of the Use of the Bible as a School Book”, 1798
Benjamin Rush, Essays, Literary, Moral & Philosophical (Philadelphia: Thomas and Samuel F. Bradford, 1798), 93.
Online Source:
Charles Carroll
Signer of the Declaration
“Without morals, a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion…are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments.”
“Letter of Charles Carroll to James McHenry,” dated November 4, 1800. Bernard C. Steiner, The Life and Correspondence of James McHenry (Cleveland: The Burrows Brothers, 1907), 475.
Samuel Adams
“Religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness.”
Letter to John Trumbull, October 16, 1778
Paul H. Smith, Gerard W. Gawalt, Rosemary Fry Plakes, et. al., Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, volume 11, October 1 1778-January 31 1779. Online Source:
texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=60&division=div1
Patrick Henry
“The great pillars of all government and of social life [are] virtue, morality, and religion. This is the armor…and this alone, that renders us invincible.”
Letter to Archibald Blair, January 8, 1799
Moses Coit Tyler, Patrick Henry (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1898; reprint, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), 409.
Alexis de Tocqueville on Democracy in America
“The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and liberty so intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive one without the other.”
Toqueville, Alexis de (1994). Democracy in America. New York, NY: Everyman’s Library, a division of Knopf and Random House Publishing.
Alexis de Tocqueville on Religion and Politics?
“The religious atmosphere of the country was the first thing that struck me upon my arrival in the U.S. In France, I had seen the spirits of religion and freedom almost always marching in opposite directions, in America, I found them intimately linked together and joined and reigned over the same land...
“Religion should therefore be considered as the first of their political institutions. From the start, politics and religion have agreed and have not since ceased to do so.”
Alexis de Tocqueville, “Democracy in America” Toqueville, Alexis de (1994). Democracy in America. New York, NY: Everyman’s Library, a division of Knopf and Random House Publishing.
Benjamin Franklin
“…only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”
Letter of Benjamin Franklin to Messrs. The Abbes Chalut and Arnaud, dated April 17, 1787. Jared Sparks, ed., The Writings of Benjamin Franklin (Boston: Tappan, Whittemore and Mason, 1840) 10:297.
Noah Webster
History of the United States, 1833
“...the moral principles and precepts contained in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws… All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible.”
Noah Webster, “Advice to the Young,” History of the United States, (New Haven: Durrie & Peck, 1832), 338-340.
John Adams
“We have no government armed in power capable of contending in human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Address to the Officers of the Massachusetts Militia, 1798
John Adams, “Letter to Zabdiel Adams, Philadelphia, 21 June 1776,” in The Works of John Adams – Second President of the United States, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1854), 9:401. Online Source:
Daniel Webster
“To preserve the government we must also preserve morals. Morality rests on religion; if you destroy the foundation, the superstructure must fall. When the public mind becomes vitiated and corrupt, laws are a nullity and constitutions are waste paper.”
4th of July, 1800, Oration at Hanover, N.H.
Daniel Webster, Fourth of July Oration Delivered at Fryeburg, ME, in the Year 1802 (A. Williams & Co. / A.F. & C.W. Lewis, Boston, Mass. / Fryeburg, Me., 1882), 12.
Online Source:
c=jul;cc=jul;sid=bcf0884fce38f535e4cd23d7d8513e09;rgn=full%20text;idno=jul000403;view=image;seq=1
“…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights…”
“...and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitles them…”
F.N. Thorpe, ed., Federal and State Constitutions (Washington: GPO, 1909), 1:3.
Online source:
experience/charters/declaration_transcript.html
Law of Nature Written on the Heart of Man
“The law of nature is that which God at the time of creation of the nature of man infused into his heart, for his preservation and direction…the moral law, called also the law of nature.”
Sir Edward Coke 1552-1634
Sir Edward Coke, Calvin’s Case in The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edward Coke, ed. Steve Sheppard (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003), 7:35.
Online Source:
William Blackstone
“…as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should, in all points, conform to his Maker's will. This will of his Maker is called the law of nature...This law of nature... dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority... from this original."
Blackstone, William (2004). Commentaries on the laws of England. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
William Blackstone
"Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these."
Blackstone, 1723-1780, “Commentaries”, 2500 copies sold in America prior to the Revolutionary War
Blackstone, William (2004). Commentaries on the laws of England. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
James Wilson
“Of the General Principles of Law and Obligation”
U.S. Supreme Court Justice - Signed U.S. Constitution
“Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine…Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.”
Wilson, James (1804). The works of the honourable James Wilson. Philadelphia, PA: Lorenzo Press for Bronson and Chauncey (3 Vols.).
Noah Webster
“It is alleged by men of loose principles, or defective views of the subject, that religion and morality are not necessary or important qualifications for political stations. But the Scriptures teach a different doctrine. They direct that rulers should be men who rule in the fear of God, able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness...”
Value of the Bible, 1834, #302
Noah Webster, Letters to a Young Gentleman Commencing His Education (New Haven, S. Converse, 1823) 18-19.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn
“More than half a century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of older people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: ‘Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.’”
“Since then I have spent well-nigh fifty years working on the history of our Revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval... But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some sixty million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.’”
Templeton Address, 1983
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “Templeton Lecture, May 10, 1983,” in The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings, 1947-2005, eds. Edward E. Ericson, Jr. and Daniel J. Mahoney (Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2006), 577.
Abraham Lincoln
“We have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of heaven. We have been preserved, these many years, in peace and prosperity. We have grown in numbers, wealth and power, as no other nation has ever grown. But we have forgotten God... ...We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace, and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us...and we have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own…
...Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us! It behooves us, then to humble ourselves before the offended Power, to confess our national sins, and to pray for clemency and forgiveness.”
Proclamation for a National Day of Fasting, Humiliation & Prayer, April 30, 1863
Abraham Lincoln, “Proclamation Appointing a National Fast Day” in Collected Works. The Abraham Lincoln Association, Springfield, Illinois, ed. Roy P. Basler (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953), 6:155-157.
Online Source:
c=lincoln;iel=4;view=text;idno=lincoln6;rgn=div1;cc=lincoln
;node=lincoln6%3A336
Thanks to The Truth Project session 10 for the source of quotes and references.
Who created the theory of "separation of church and state?" It is not in the constitution. Anyone that reads the constitution can clearly see that this was created as a Christian nation. It is ashamed that Christians have set back and let a very small minority of people strip our basic rights from us. Any attempt to remove our national motto from our currency would be unconstitutional.
- 3 votes
John-422352: "Anyone that reads the constitution can clearly see that this was created as a Christian nation."
YOU obviously have not read the Constitution.
- 10 votes
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Rather than playing the "obviously you haven't/I have" game; I decided to post the 1st Amendemnt to the Constitution. Perhaps we were not being clear enough for John, it is in the Bill of Rights.
- 6 votes
There is no "separation of church and state" in the 1st amendment either.
- 2 votes
"It has often been seen on the Internet that to find God in the Constitution, all one has to do is read it, and see how often the Framers used the words "God," or "Creator," "Jesus," or "Lord." Except for one notable instance, however, none of these words ever appears in the Constitution, neither the original nor in any of the Amendments. The notable exception is found in the Signatory section, where the date is written thusly: "Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven". The use of the word "Lord" here is not a religious reference, however. This was a common way of expressing the date, in both religious and secular contexts. This lack of any these words does not mean that the Framers were not spiritual people, any more than the use of the word Lord means that they were. What this lack of these words is expositive of is not a love for or disdain for religion, but the feeling that the new government should not involve itself in matters of religion. In fact, the original Constitution bars any religious test to hold any federal office in the United States."
.
.
Treaty of Tripoli - Ratified by the U.S. Senate on June 7, 1797 and signed by President John Adams on June 10, 1797. Article 11: "As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
"It has often been seen on the Internet that to find God in the Constitution, all one has to do is read it, and see how often the Framers used the words "God," or "Creator," "Jesus," or "Lord." Except for one notable instance, however, none of these words ever appears in the Constitution, neither the original nor in any of the Amendments. The notable exception is found in the Signatory section, where the date is written thusly: "Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven". The use of the word "Lord" here is not a religious reference, however. This was a common way of expressing the date, in both religious and secular contexts. This lack of any these words does not mean that the Framers were not spiritual people, any more than the use of the word Lord means that they were. What this lack of these words is expositive of is not a love for or disdain for religion, but the feeling that the new government should not involve itself in matters of religion. In fact, the original Constitution bars any religious test to hold any federal office in the United States."
.
.
Treaty of Tripoli - Ratified by the U.S. Senate on June 7, 1797 and signed by President John Adams on June 10, 1797. Article 11: "As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
- 6 votes
Actually churches in Colonial America wanted separation of church and state so that there would not be a national religion like many of the European countries had.
This is a comment on having "In God We Trust" on our US coins. It doesn't say Jesus or Allah or the One True God--no divinity is specifically named. God is named, of course. But over ninety percent of the world's population believes in a God of some sort. It is the nature of democracy to respect the minority while being ruled by the majority. How about we do that? Thanks for letting me contribute to the conversation on this issue.
- 2 votes
Your comment is concise, respectful, and seems to bring us back to the question that began this discussion; thanks, Robin. My response is that the Bill of Rights is designed to protect the individual against the "tyranny of the majority." So that even if the Christian (or more generally God-fearing) majority in this country were to elect legislators to pass a law for a state religion, the 1st Amendment would prevent it. I think the issue that the judicial branch has yet to really rule on is whether even something as non-specific as monotheism is prohibited by the spirit of the 1st Amendment.
As others have pointed out in in this thread, Aronow vs. U.S. (1970, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) says that the phrase "In God We Trust" is "patriotic and ceremonial" and denies that it endorses religion. I disagree with this interpretation; by invoking a single God, the phrase denies nontheistic, multitheistic, and atheistic beliefs.
In summary, Bills of Rights are designed to protect individuals from tyranny of majority; no matter what the majority wants, 1st Amendment protects the country from promoting a national religion. Even if invoking "God" does not invoke a specific religion, it is specific enough in its monotheism to promote certain TYPES of religion over other belief systems.
People are missing the other right...yes, we have separation of church and state for good reason...
But we also have freedom of religious expression, --equal-- to the separation of church and state....It is not for public institutions to favor or erect any particular religion.
Now in a nearby town, children were told to create cards for the December holiday...which one? Well, a few wanted to put 'Merry Christmas' on their cards!!!!! And then they were told by teacher, and then the principal, that they could not write 'Merry Christmas' on their cards...a mother went to a lawyer and the lawyer told her that the children are allowed under freedom of religious expression to write whatever they want on their winter holiday cards.
So mother went back to the teacher and principal, and repeated her rights...most of the children in the room freely chose 'Merry Christmas'. Case closed.
As I said on another post....I live in the unhappiest city in America. We have a porn shop with semi-nude clothing on the front window...families live behind it...Every school day you go down the street, and you can see little school children on the public school bus going around the parking lot, to directly along side the window to get a peep, around and down to pick up more little children to take to school. They come back in the afternoon.
Nobody cares about the children in this unhappy city. There are many, many depressed people. We live in very, very pro-choice, pro-abortion area. We know what abortion does. My money goes pay for them. I don't tolerate that very well. We have to have our money with the motto go to things I don't like very much. In fact, I get pretty upset just like the atheists do when they see God on their money.
I would think it much more easier to tolerate having the motto on the money because it is probably being used in many social projects atheists greatly approve of. Plus atheists can take their money to buy whatever they want...
This country was founded on our belief in one God. Since people have fought to remove God from everything they possibly could, our nation has begun to crumble. Look around, our country is getting worse and worse the more we distance ourself from faith. "One Nation Under God", and we wonder why everything is falling apart?? How can we stand strong as a nation when there continues to be those who want to divide us? People coming to this country can be free of religious persecution but how dare anyone one tell us we can not believe in the God that made this country what it is (was).
- 2 votes
-This country was founded on our belief in one God.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." (Benjamin Franklin)
"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?" (John Adams)
"It is not to be understood that I am with him (Jesus Christ) in all his doctrines. I am a Materialist; he takes the side of Spiritualism; he preaches the efficacy of repentance toward forgiveness of sin; I require a counterpoise of good works to redeem it." (Thomas Jefferson)
-Since people have fought to remove God from everything they possibly could, our nation has begun to crumble.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with our President.
-People coming to this country can be free of religious persecution
Unless they do not have one?
-how dare anyone one tell us we can not believe in the God
I just want your God off my money
- 9 votes
Adam,
You are blinded and have no idea of who Christ really is? Someday you will have to bow and confess He is Christ, the Savior, and I would suggest you find it is your heart to do it BEFORE die. You'll be better off, ETERNALLY, if you do so!
- 2 votes
Your version of Christ sounds arrogant and needy. No wonder people misunderstand the Christian faith. Unfortunately it seems that so many Christians and people of faith "bow and confess" only so they are not damned in the next life. Live by the priciples and the teachings of Christ because it is the right thing to do - not so you won't be punished later if you don't, or so that you can use it to threaten other people with damnation. What happened to our love and embracing in this life? We are taught "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." All this hate and belittlement on both sides just gets sucked into a black void where no understanding is reached. Yes, our country is going down the tubes, and look at the last few years - prime example. We've been ruled by greed and selfishness, certainly not the "moral upper-hand." God and Jesus are in my heart and my familys'. I don't need Their images and names all over everything to remind me of what I believe in.
Nancy-431842
Adam,
You are blinded and have no idea of who Christ really is? Someday you will have to bow and confess He is Christ, the Savior, and I would suggest you find it is your heart to do it BEFORE die. You'll be better off, ETERNALLY, if you do so!
Ummm no, you will! Not me and likely not Adam. You know why? Because that's your religion, that's yoru interpretation of your religion, and it's despicable for you to tell him that if he doesn't bow down to your religion he'll suffer! We do not live in a theocracy, by the Goddess, and I am glad of it!
How arrogant of you to tell someone that you know the one and only true and correct path and anyone who doesn't kowtow and follow your path will suffer for it. And it's not very Christian of you to say so either! So much for Love.
- 3 votes
freethinker-- Have YOU? Because I have. Multiple times. Even wrote papers on it, and summarized it for a class in Government and Politics. So I know my constitution--and my American history. Here are some facts for you:
1-"Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian." - United States Supreme Court, 1892. I think this quote should be sufficient enough to show you that, while not being run by one religion, this country was founded upon Christian morals and principles (which, religious or not, most people adhere to anyway. Do not murder, anyone? Hm, there's a law based on a religious principle. Should it then be eradicated? I doubt you think so.).
2-As far as "intolerance" goes, Patrick Henry has said, "It cannot be emphasized too strongly that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded assylum, prosperity and freedom of worship here."
3- Because I'm sure you will think I have no thoughts of my own, having based my first two points upon quotes: Out of the 55 writers and signers of the United States Constitution, 100% of them had a God-based religion. None of them were atheists or agnostics. Most were Anglicans or Calvinists, with two Catholics, one Quaker, and one Deist (Ben Franklin, who, incidentally, started the tradition in Congress of prayer before each session...prayer to the Lord God Almighty). Therefore, it spits in the face of the true spirit of America to remove "In God We Trust" from our currency. Face it--the Founding Fathers believed in, trusted, and worshipped a creator God, and most of them were professing Christians. This does not make Christianity the "Official Religion" of the country, or mean only Christians can live here; it simply means that our nation was created on the morals and principles of the Bible, a fact that we honor by having "In God We Trust" embossed upon our coins.
Finally, I would like to note that this phrase cannot go against separation of church and state or be unconstitutional--the phrase "separation of church and state" was coined (ha) by Jefferson in a personal letter, where Jefferson only meant that, unlike in England, a country cannot and should not enforce an official religion, or exclude people based on their own faiths. He did NOT say eliminate the church, only keep it from becoming law, and keep law from disturbing the church.
I hope this has enlightened you a bit, because John is right: we WERE founded on Christianity, despite our gross attempted eradication thereof.
- 3 votes
"Do not murder, anyone? Hm, there's a law based on a religious principle. Should it then be eradicated? I doubt you think so.). "
Since when is that a religious principle? It has certainly been around a lot longer than the Bible. That's a bit presumptuous of you.
"As far as "intolerance" goes, Patrick Henry has said, "It cannot be emphasized too strongly that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded assylum, prosperity and freedom of worship here.""
He never said that. Try citing a work of his that contains it. If you find only websites, see if they provide a source. I can tell you now that they don't.
"Therefore, it spits in the face of the true spirit of America to remove "In God We Trust" from our currency. Face it--the Founding Fathers believed in, trusted, and worshipped a creator God, and most of them were professing Christians."
And they had the good sense to realize that the government needed to stay far away from religion if they were to be able to continue to be free in their beliefs.
"This does not make Christianity the "Official Religion" of the country, or mean only Christians can live here; it simply means that our nation was created on the morals and principles of the Bible, a fact that we honor by having "In God We Trust" embossed upon our coins."
I don't recall the founders ever expressing any desire to stamp a religious statement on our money. Do you? As I recall, it was only during the 1950s, an era of paranoia, suspicion and persecution that it was deemed desirable to print that phrase on our money and add it to our pledge of allegiance.
"Jefferson only meant that, unlike in England, a country cannot and should not enforce an official religion, or exclude people based on their own faiths. He did NOT say eliminate the church, only keep it from becoming law, and keep law from disturbing the church."
Since when is removing a religious statement from our money, one that was only just put there in the 1950s, and certainly not by the founders, considered the same as eliminating "the church"? I suppose it's somewhat natural for a religious group that has done so much persecution of its own over the centuries to be somewhat hypersensitive to persecution themselves, but this is just a bit ridiculous. Removing the phrase from our money is not going to shut down your church or not allow you to pray or believe what you like. So quit making such ridiculous arguments.
"I hope this has enlightened you a bit, because John is right: we WERE founded on Christianity, despite our gross attempted eradication thereof. "
The only enlightenment I've gained from this discussion is the realization that there are many Christians that believe a lot of made-up quotes and information, have no idea when or why the phrase "In God we trust" was added to our money or our pledge, and take a very cavalier attitude in telling people to get out of THEIR country. Is it any wonder why the minority don't really feel that the Christian religion needs any assistance from the government?
I hope this has enlightened you a bit, because John is right: we WERE founded on Christianity, despite our gross attempted eradication thereof.
- 1 vote
Treaty of Tripoly, Art. 11, drafted near the end of Washington's second term and proclaimed and signed UNANIMOUSLY by the Senate (some of which were the founding fathers) in 1797 during Adams presidency , "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"
Isn't "god exists" the most important SENSE of Christian theology (let alone the rest)?
What exactly are "Christian" laws and what distinguishes them from non-Christian ones? Are they based upon Christian principles like, for example, the doctrine of vicarious atonement? Should we employ this Christian principle and let people go to jail for other people who did the actual crimes (which the mafia would love)? What about the virgin birth? Should we legislate cloning in order to take some of the sin out of reproduction? Jesus cracked a whip at venders and money changers in the temple (John 2:13-16). Should we have legislation against any kind of questionable secular activity in churches? Should we have legislation encouraging or even mandating book burnings of questionable material, like in Acts 19:19-20? I could go on and on at the silly idea of "Christian" laws...
- 1 vote
Believer-422425@#36:
You are incorrect. The colonies that formed the basis of this country was founded by a number of people who couldn't decide which version of God to worship, or more importantly, how to do so. The country itself was founded by a number of far-seeing individuals that understood that no matter what their personal beliefs, forcing ANYONE to believe something is a bad idea. The problem is that your idea of "free of religious persecution" appears to be, "suck it up and embrace Christianity, or else shut up."
The nation isn't falling apart because we're distancing ourselves from God. I'm not going to say there aren't any problems, but if you pay close attention to history, problems exist in every society--and that includes those idealized 17th Century colonies and Old World Europe.
- 5 votes
and most of these problems begin when these societies pull away from God.
- 3 votes
I see, so, tell me: At what point did the United States not have any problems of this nature? If your point is accurate, there must have been a point when we had no crime, no poverty, no persecution...or is it just that selective processing of statistics produces better results?
I will grant you that 200 years ago there was a much healthier attitude toward God in this country. It was a matter of personal opinion, not a matter of national policy.
- 3 votes
and most of these problems begin when these societies pull away from God.
Ah yes, because Saudi Arabia, with its close relationship to God, is such a wonderful place to live.
- 9 votes
Really? Sharia law touts itself as directly based on Islamic edicts, and Islam worships the same god you do, positing Jesus as a mortal prophet.
- 5 votes
Again, jack-why is it that you constantly bring up other violent countries when discussing anything related to Christians? I cant help it if we have religous freaks in Muslim countries, Saudi, whatever. We are talking about america. This is not a support group for angry Jack who has a personal desire and anger toward the chrisitan religion. It is about whether the word "God" "establishes a theocracy in the United States. If you feel the word does, that is fine. But why do you rant about ancient history, Saudi Arabia, the Inquistioin, the mccarthy years, etc. We are in 2008-get a grip and get over your rage or politely state why God establishes an official religion. Move on. Nobody here is that interested in getting a cheap history lesson from you.
- 2 votes
PATRICK HENRY:
"Orator of the Revolution." • This is all the inheritance I can give my dear family. The religion of Christ can give them one which will make them rich indeed." —The Last Will and Testament of Patrick Henry
"It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here." [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
JOHN HANCOCK &JOHN ADAMS: We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]
JOHN ADAMS: " The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." • "[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty." –John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress
SAMUEL ADAMS: | Portrait of Sam Adams | " He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all." [ "American Independence," August 1, 1776. Speech delivered at the State House in Philadelphia] " Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity… and leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christian system." [October 4, 1790]
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS:
• "Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?" "Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity"?
--1837, at the age of 69, when he delivered a Fourth of July speech at Newburyport, Massachusetts.
CHARLES CARROLL - signer of the Declaration of Independence | Portrait of Charles Carroll
" Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure...are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments." [Source: To James McHenry on November 4, 1800.]
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: | Portrait of Ben Franklin " God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel" –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern." In 1787 when Franklin helped found Benjamin Franklin University, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning, built on Christ, the Cornerstone."
ALEXANDER HAMILTON: • Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:
(1) Christianity
(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity. "The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States." On July 12, 1804 at his death, Hamilton said, "I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me." "For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." [1787 after the Constitutional Convention] "I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man."
GEORGE WASHINGTON: "What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ." [speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779] "To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian" [May 2, 1778, at Valley Forge]
THOMAS JEFFERSON:
" The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man." "Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus." "I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever." (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]
PATRICK HENRY:
"Orator of the Revolution." • This is all the inheritance I can give my dear family. The religion of Christ can give them one which will make them rich indeed." —The Last Will and Testament of Patrick Henry
"It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here." [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
JOHN HANCOCK &JOHN ADAMS: We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]
JOHN ADAMS: " The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." • "[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty." –John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress
SAMUEL ADAMS: | Portrait of Sam Adams | " He who made all men hath made the truths necessary to human happiness obvious to all… Our forefathers opened the Bible to all." [ "American Independence," August 1, 1776. Speech delivered at the State House in Philadelphia] " Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity… and leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christian system." [October 4, 1790]
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS:
• "Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?" "Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity"?
--1837, at the age of 69, when he delivered a Fourth of July speech at Newburyport, Massachusetts.
CHARLES CARROLL - signer of the Declaration of Independence | Portrait of Charles Carroll
" Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure...are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments." [Source: To James McHenry on November 4, 1800.]
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: | Portrait of Ben Franklin " God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel" –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern." In 1787 when Franklin helped found Benjamin Franklin University, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning, built on Christ, the Cornerstone."
ALEXANDER HAMILTON: • Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great:
(1) Christianity
(2) a Constitution formed under Christianity. "The Christian Constitutional Society, its object is first: The support of the Christian religion. Second: The support of the United States." On July 12, 1804 at his death, Hamilton said, "I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me." "For my own part, I sincerely esteem it [the Constitution] a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." [1787 after the Constitutional Convention] "I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man."
GEORGE WASHINGTON: "What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ." [speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779] "To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian" [May 2, 1778, at Valley Forge]
THOMAS JEFFERSON:
" The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man." "Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus." "I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever." (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]
- 4 votes
What line of the constitution does it state the separation of church and state? Read it! It's not there. It is from a letter from by a founding father. Our founding fathers were Christians. That's why they come here for FREEDOM OF RELIGION. If our founding father trusted God why can't we? I think they were intelligent men do you? If not Why are you here? If the ten commandments carved in the supreme court walls doesn't tell people what is country was founded on, nothing does. When you take God out of America you take out the whole bases she was founded on and she will crumble.
- 2 votes
So, tell me...since Mohammed is depicted on the same walls as Moses in the Supreme Court with the tablets mean there is a special connection with Islam?
- 6 votes
Islamist, Jews, Christains ALL worship the same GOD.
Why sould,nt they be shown together?
- 2 votes
Islamist worship the false god known as Allah, not the one and only God.
- 5 votes
So, that would be one vote for "No, the "God" in "In God We Trust" is not an inclusive one.
I'll guess that extends to Shiva, Vishnu, Odin, Thor, Zeus, and Poseidon, too.
- 4 votes
Islamist worship the false god known as Allah, not the one and only God.
I literally roflmao. You are either the greatest troll ever or a diluted man incapable of even following his own dogma.
- 3 votes
Larry, first off Allah ISN"T the name that GOD gave himself in the Bible, His name as Given is Jehovah, or Yahweh, either one is correct. Second Muslims believe that Jesus was a prophet, not even as great as Mohammed, but Jesus testified that he was the earthly representaion of God, and was himself Divine, that is hardly in the same vein as what the Muslims believe, please do some reading and know what your saying before you spout things off the top of your head
- 3 votes
Founding fathers owned slaves, consumed narcotics and denied voting rights to women and the poor. Perhaps we should restore all of that as well?
- 4 votes
it makes me very mad at the ignorance of the people who believe we should remove anything that contains the word God in it.We as Americans have lost almost everything now our freedom of speech our right to pray in school our right to say the pledge of allegiance in schools or right to discipline our children our right to smoke if they take away God they may as well just send us all to Russia
- 6 votes
How does this have anything to do with "ignorance", grandof?
The only ignorance related to this issue is the ignorance of those who believe that christianity is the only religion in the United States.
- 1 vote
Robert - first off Allah ISN"T the name that GOD gave himself in the Bible, His name as Given i

